A3608-2011: Directs courts to exonerate bail and order recognizance when no grand jury action has occurred for 45 days from arraignment, unless the people show good cause


Same as: / Versions: A3608-2011
Print HTML Page / Print Original Bill Format / / Read or Leave Comments

Directs courts to exonerate bail and order recognizance when no grand jury action has occurred for 45 days from arraignment, unless the people show good cause otherwise.
Sponsor: Titus (MS) / Multi-sponsor(s): Gottfried, Jaffee, Jeffries, Perry, Zebrowski / Co-sponsor(s): Cook, O'Donnell, Clark, Wright
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd SS530.20 & 530.40, CP L

A3608-2011 Actions

A3608-2011 Text

 S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 
3608 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N ASSEMBLY January 26, 2011
Introduced by M. of A. TITUS, COOK, O'DONNELL, CLARK, WRIGHT -- Multi Sponsored by -- M. of A. GOTTFRIED, JAFFEE, JEFFRIES, PERRY, ZEBROWSKI -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to exoneration of bail

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


Section 1.

Section 530.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 3 to read as follows:
3. WHEN A LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT HAS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION, ORDERED BAIL WITH RESPECT TO A DEFENDANT CHARGED BY FELONY COMPLAINT, AND THE DEFENDANT IS SUBSEQUENTLY AT LIBERTY IN THE ACTION FOLLOWING THE POSTING OF BAIL, SUCH COURT SHALL UPON APPLICATION OF THE DEFENDANT, EXONERATE BAIL AND ORDER RECOGNIZANCE WHEN, AT THE TIME OF THE DEFEND ANT'S APPLICATION THEREFOR, THE FELONY COMPLAINT HAS BEEN PENDING IN SUCH LOCAL CRIMINAL COURT, WITH NO ACTION OF THE GRAND JURY, FOR A PERI OD OF AT LEAST FORTY-FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE DEFENDANT'S ARRAIGN MENT THEREON; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE COURT MAY DENY SUCH APPLICA TION WHERE THE PEOPLE SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY BAIL SHOULD NOT BE EXONERATED.

S 2.

Section 530.40 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:
5. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION TWO OF THIS SECTION, WHERE A DEFENDANT CHARGED BY FELONY COMPLAINT IS AT LIBERTY IN THE ACTION FOLLOWING THE POSTING OF BAIL, THE COURT SHALL UPON APPLICATION OF THE DEFENDANT, EXONERATE BAIL AND ORDER RECOGNIZANCE WHEN, AT THE TIME OF THE DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION THEREFOR, SUCH FELONY COMPLAINT HAS BEEN PENDING, WITH NO ACTION OF THE GRAND JURY, FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST FORTY-FIVE DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE DEFENDANT'S ARRAIGNMENT THEREON; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THE COURT MAY DENY SUCH APPLICATION WHERE THE PEOPLE SHOW GOOD CAUSE WHY BAIL SHOULD NOT BE EXONERATED.

S 3. This act shall take effect immediately. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD08026-01-1

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus