Requires the court to state on the record why it deviated from the recommended sentence set forth in the pre-sentence investigation report.
Sponsor: KRUGER / Committee: CODES
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S390.20, CP L
Sponsor: KRUGER / Committee: CODES
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S390.20, CP L
S1955-2011 Actions
- Jan 14, 2011: REFERRED TO CODES
S1955-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S1955 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the use of pre-sentence investigation reports SUMMARY: This bill would add a new subdivision five to section 390.20 of the Criminal Procedure Law to provide that whenever a criminal court imposes a sentence upon a criminal offender which deviates from the recommended sentence contained in the criminal defender's pre-sentence report, the court would be required to state on the record the reasons for such deviation. JUSTIFICATION: At present, a sentencing judge may impose a sentence upon convicted criminals which deviates from the sentence recommended by the Probation Department without the need to explain such deviation. Often, the court sentences an individual to probation when incarceration is recommended by the probation officer. Judges should explain their reasons for doing so on the record, to ensure the victims, their families, prosecutors and members of the public why these recommendations are not being followed. This bill would accomplish this by requiring judges to state their reason(s) for not following the Probation Department's recommendation, on the record. FISCAL IMPLICATION: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the first day of the calendar month next succeeding the sixtieth day it shall have become a law.
S1955-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
1955 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE January 14, 2011
Introduced by Sen. KRUGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the use of pre-sentence investigation reports
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:
5. REASONS FOR DEVIATION FROM REPORT. WHENEVER THE COURT IMPOSES A SENTENCE WHICH DEVIATES FROM THE RECOMMENDED SENTENCE CONTAINED IN THE DEFENDANT'S PRE-SENTENCE REPORT, THE COURT SHALL STATE ON THE RECORD THE REASONS FOR SUCH DEVIATION.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the first day of the calendar month next succeeding the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD06786-01-1

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus