Bill S2627-2011

Authorizes the posting of a bond in custody cases

Authorizes the court to require a non-custodial parent, when the court reasonably determines that there is a risk of flight, to post a bond to ensure return of a child in custody and visitation orders; provides that the amount of the bond shall be determined based on all of the facts and circumstances available to the court.

Details

Actions

  • Jan 27, 2011: REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S2627

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act, in relation to requiring posting of a bond in custody proceedings

PURPOSE OF THE BILL: This bill would authorize the court to order the posting of a bond in certain custody cases in an attempt to address the serious problem of custodial interference.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: The bill amends the domestic relations law and the family court act to provide that where the court determines that there is a risk that a noncustodial parent may flee with the child, the court may order the noncustodial parent to post a bond to ensure that any child subject to such order is returned to the custodial parent at the end of any visitation period.

JUSTIFICATION: According to the 1990 National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway and Thrownaway Children, nearly 350,000 children are abducted by family members each year. Abduction of a child whether by a stranger or by a family member is every parent's worst nightmare. Even though the child is with the noncustodial parent, that does not necessarily ensure the health, safety or the well being of the child. Frequently, the child is taken by the noncustodial parent out of revenge and many do not receive the proper care or schooling. Furthermore, the child often suffers psychologically. In addition to the negative consequences for the child, the left-behind parent not only feels helpless, depressed and anxious but also experiences the great financial burden of trying to search for the missing child. Child advocates including the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children recommend that some court orders include a bond provision, which should increase the likelihood of the timely return of children and provide some measure of reassurance to the custodial parent.

EFFECTIVE DATE: First of November


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 2627 2011-2012 Regular Sessions IN SENATE January 27, 2011 ___________
Introduced by Sen. KRUGER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Children and Families AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act, in relation to requiring posting of a bond in custody proceedings THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 240 of the domestic relations law is amended by adding a new subdivision 6 to read as follows: 6. POSTING OF BOND. AS PART OF A CHILD SUPPORT ORDER, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTODIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 2. Section 447 of the family court act is amended by adding a new subdivision (c) to read as follows: (C) AS PART OF ANY ORDER UNDER THIS SECTION, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTODIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 3. Section 467 of the family court act is amended by adding a new subdivision (d) to read as follows: (D) AS PART OF A DETERMINATION OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE
NONCUSTODIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTO- DIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUM- STANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 4. Section 549 of the family court act is amended by adding a new subdivision (c) to read as follows: (C) AS PART OF AN ORDER UNDER THIS SECTION, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTODIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 5. Section 651 of the family court act is amended by adding a new subdivision (g) to read as follows: (G) AS PART OF ANY DETERMINATION UNDER THIS SECTION, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE NONCUSTODIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTODIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 6. Section 652 of the family court act is amended by adding a new subdivision (d) to read as follows: (D) IN ANY DETERMINATION OF AN APPLICATION PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, IN ANY CASE WHERE THE COURT REASONABLY DETERMINES THAT THERE IS A RISK THAT A NONCUSTODIAL PARENT MAY FLEE, THE COURT MAY ORDER THE NONCUSTO- DIAL PARENT TO POST A BOND IN AN AMOUNT DETERMINED BY THE COURT, TO ENSURE THAT ANY CHILD SUBJECT TO SUCH ORDER IS RETURNED TO THE CUSTODIAL PARENT AT THE END OF ANY VISITATION PERIOD PROVIDED FOR THEREIN. THE AMOUNT OF SUCH BOND SHALL BE BASED UPON ALL THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES AVAILABLE TO THE COURT IN ASSESSING WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. S 7. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeed- ing the date on which it shall have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus