Relates to mercury-added consumer products.
Sponsor: GRISANTI / Co-sponsor(s): AVELLA, DUANE, PERKINS
Law Section: Environmental Conservation Law / Law: Amd S27-2107, En Con L
Sponsor: GRISANTI / Co-sponsor(s): AVELLA, DUANE, PERKINS
Law Section: Environmental Conservation Law / Law: Amd S27-2107, En Con L
S3888-2011 Actions
- May 3, 2011: SUBSTITUTED BY A668
- May 2, 2011: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Apr 13, 2011: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Apr 12, 2011: 1ST REPORT CAL.345
- Mar 8, 2011: REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
S3888-2011 Meetings
Environmental Conservation: Apr 12, 2011S3888-2011 Calendars
Active List: May 3, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 13, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 2, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 3, 2011S3888-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Environmental Conservation
- Apr 12, 2011
Ayes (12): Grisanti, LaValle, Little, Marcellino, Maziarz, O'Mara, Young, Avella, Espaillat, Perkins, Serrano, Stewart-Cousins
Ayes W/R (1): Johnson
Excused (1): Oppenheimer
S3888-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3888 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to mercury-added consumer products PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: The purpose of this bill is to provide a technical amendment to the law restricting the sale of certain mercury-added products. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: This bill would: * remove, beginning January 1, 2012, the requirement that the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) make an affirmative finding that there are non-mercury alternative products prior to prohibiting the sale of mercury containing sphygmomanometers, relays, flame sensors and thermostats; * authorize DEC to grant a waiver upon request by the manufacturer and information demonstrating: * there are no non-mercury alternatives comparable in price, effect or accuracy; or, * the use of mercury-added products provides a net benefit to the environment, public health, or public safety; * there are other factors affecting the use of non-mercury alternatives; and * permit DEC to grant waivers and renewals for a renewals for a period not to exceed two years. JUSTIFICATION:; The law enacted in 2004 authorized a ban of certain mercury-containing products upon a finding by the Department that there were mercury-free alternatives. At a hearing held by the Assembly Environmental Conservation Committee in 2009, the Department testified that they were unable to make such a finding because of the myriad of products available. Other states, including Maine and Wisconsin, have adopted bans without requiring such an affirmative finding. This legislation follows those models and better reflects the intent of the 2004 legislation. This bill would protect the environment and public health by prohibiting the sale of certain products that contain mercury, and ensuring that such products are properly disposed of when they are no longer in service. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2010: A.11145 (Jaffee) - Referred to Environmental Conservation Committee. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the state. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately. However, any written findings of the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation shall remain in full force and effect until January 1, 2012.
S3888-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
3888 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE March 8, 2011
Introduced by Sen. GRISANTI -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Environmental Conservation
AN ACT to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to mercury-added consumer products
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 8 of section 27-2107 of the environmental conservation law, as added by chapter 676 of the laws of 2005, is amended to read as follows:
8. On or after January first, two thousand [eight, but no later thanFebruary twentieth, two thousand eight, and thereafter upon writtenrequest, but not more than once a year, the commissioner shall issue awritten finding as to whether non-mercury alternatives are comparable inprice to, are as effective in performance as, and are as accurate andprecise as] TWELVE, NO PERSON SHALL SELL, OFFER FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTE ANY mercury [sphygmomanometers] SPHYGMOMANOMETER, mercury wetted reed [relays] RELAY, mercury flame [sensors] SENSOR, mercury [thermometersother than thermometers prohibited from sale pursuant to subdivision twoof this section] THERMOMETER, or mercury [thermostats] THERMOSTAT, except for mercury thermostats used by a blind or visually impaired person. [Upon making an affirmative finding that a non-mercury alterna-tive is comparable in price to, is as effective in performance as, andis as accurate and precise as any mercury-added consumer product deline-ated in this subdivision, no person shall sell, offer for sale ordistribute such mercury-added consumer product for which the commission-er has made such an affirmative finding.] The provisions of this subdi vision shall not apply to the sale or distribution of any mercury-added consumer product delineated in this subdivision [for which the commis-sioner has made such an affirmative finding,] if such product is used to replace a product that is a component in a larger product in use prior to [the issuance of such affirmative finding] JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOU EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03978-01-1
S. 3888 2 SAND TWELVE or the resale of any mercury-added consumer product deline ated in this subdivision[, for which the commissioner has made such anaffirmative finding,] manufactured prior to [the issuance of such affir-mative finding] JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND TWELVE.
S 2.
Section 27-2107 of the environmental conservation law is amended by adding a new subdivision 10 to read as follows:
10. THE DEPARTMENT MAY GRANT A WAIVER FROM THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVI SION EIGHT OF THIS SECTION UPON REQUEST BY THE MANUFACTURER OF A MERCU RY-ADDED CONSUMER PRODUCT. (A) AN APPLICATION FOR A WAIVER SHALL BE IN THE FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE DEPARTMENT AND DOCUMENT THE BASIS FOR THE REQUESTED WAIVER OR RENEWAL OF A WAIVER AND DESCRIBE HOW THE MANUFACTURER WILL ENSURE THAT A SYSTEM EXISTS FOR THE PROPER COLLECTION, TRANSPORTATION AND PROCESSING OF THE MERCURY-ADDED CONSUMER PRODUCTS AT THE END OF THEIR USEFUL LIFE. (B) THE APPLICATION MUST INCLUDE AT A MINIMUM, INFORMATION THAT DEMON STRATES:
(I) THERE ARE NO NON-MERCURY ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE COMPARABLE IN PRICE TO, ARE AS EFFECTIVE IN PERFORMANCE AS, OR ARE AS ACCURATE AND PRECISE AS THE IDENTIFIED MERCURY-ADDED CONSUMER PRODUCT; (II) THE USE OF THE MERCURY-ADDED CONSUMER PRODUCT PROVIDES A NET BENEFIT TO THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH, OR PUBLIC SAFETY WHEN COMPARED TO A NON-MERCURY ALTERNATIVE; OR (III) THERE ARE OTHER FACTORS AFFECTING THE USE OF NON-MERCURY ALTER NATIVES. (C) THE MANUFACTURER MUST NOTIFY THE REGIONAL MULTI-STATE CLEARING HOUSE, AS IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 27-2115 OF THIS TITLE, OF ITS REQUEST FOR A WAIVER PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION AND PROVIDE THE CLEARINGHOUSE WITH THE INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ITS WAIVER APPLICATION. (D) THE DEPARTMENT MAY GRANT OR DENY, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER. IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO GRANT OR DENY A WAIVER OR WAIVER RENEWAL, THE DEPARTMENT MAY CONSULT WITH THE CLEARINGHOUSE, OTHER STATES, OR REGIONAL GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS TO PROMOTE CONSISTENCY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS SUBDIVISION. (E) WAIVERS SHALL BE GRANTED FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED TWO YEARS. UPON A REQUEST BY THE MANUFACTURER, THE DEPARTMENT MAY RENEW A WAIVER FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED TWO YEARS IF THE DEPARTMENT FINDS THAT THE MANUFACTURER CONTINUES TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A WAIVER, THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAS COMPLIED WITH ALL CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL WAIVER, AND THE MANUFACTURER DEMONSTRATES THAT REASONABLE EFFORTS HAVE BEEN MADE TO REMOVE MERCURY FROM THE PRODUCT SUBJECT TO THE WAIVER.
S 3. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that any written findings of the commissioner of environmental conservation issued pursuant to subdivision 8 of section 27-2107 of the environmental conservation law, as it existed prior to the amendments made by section one of this act, shall remain in full force and effect until January 1, 2012 and upon that date shall be deemed repealed.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus