Prohibits the electronic recording of certain information identifying information of a person subjected to temporary questioning or search in a public place by police officers.
Sponsor: ADAMS / Co-sponsor(s): ESPADA, MONTGOMERY, PARKER, PERALTA
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S140.50, CP L
Sponsor: ADAMS / Co-sponsor(s): ESPADA, MONTGOMERY, PARKER, PERALTA
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S140.50, CP L
S7945A-2009 Actions
- Jul 16, 2010: SIGNED CHAP.176
- Jul 6, 2010: DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
- Jun 29, 2010: returned to senate
- Jun 29, 2010: passed assembly
- Jun 29, 2010: ordered to third reading rules cal.113
- Jun 29, 2010: substituted for a11177a
- Jun 23, 2010: referred to codes
- Jun 23, 2010: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 23, 2010: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 18, 2010: AMENDED ON THIRD READING (T) 7945A
- Jun 10, 2010: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Jun 9, 2010: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Jun 8, 2010: 1ST REPORT CAL.861
- May 25, 2010: REFERRED TO CODES
S7945A-2009 Calendars
Active List: Jun 23, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 21, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 22, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 23, 2010S7945A-2009 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Codes
- Jun 8, 2010
Ayes (9): Schneiderman, Breslin, Duane, Parker, Huntley, Sampson, Klein, Perkins, Squadron
Nays (7): Volker, Saland, DeFrancisco, Bonacic, Golden, Lanza, Flanagan
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 23, 2010
Ayes (32): Adams, Addabbo, Aubertine, Breslin, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Espada, Foley, Hassell-Thomps, Huntley, Johnson C, Klein, Krueger, Kruger, Montgomery, Onorato, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Sampson, Savino, Schneiderman, Serrano, Smith, Squadron, Stachowski, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins, Thompson, Valesky
Nays (29): Alesi, Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Golden, Griffo, Hannon, Johnson O, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Leibell, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, Padavan, Ranzenhofer, Robach, Saland, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Winner, Young
Excused (1): Morahan
S7945A-2009 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S7945A TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to temporary questioning of persons in public places in cities with a population of one million or more PURPOSE: To protect the privacy and due-process rights of innocent New Yorkers who are stopped by the police and subsequently released without further legal action. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: This bill prohibits the police from entering into an electronic database the personal identifiers of individuals who have been stopped and/or frisked by police and released without any further legal action. This provision does not prohibit police from entering into an electronic database generic identifiers, such as gender, race, and location of the stop. JUSTIFICATION: New York City police routinely stop, question, and frisk New Yorkers at alarmingly high rates. Most of those stopped are completely innocent of wrongdoing. And of the hundreds of thousands of law-abiding New Yorkers stopped every year, the vast majority are black and Latino. In 2009, for example, the NYPD stopped 574,304 individuals. Of those who were the subject of a police stop that year, nearly ninety percent were people of color; and nine of every ten persons stopped were released without any further legal action taken against them. NYPD data demonstrate that the police have conducted in 2.5 million stops since 2005.(1) However, the problem of excessive and unjustified street stops is exacerbated by the NYPD's practice of entering into a an electronic database the personal information - including names and addresses - of the millions of innocent people stopped by the police. These individuals are now permanently under police suspicion and surveillance. There is no legitimate justification for such a database. According to the NYPD, the database is maintained for use in future investigations. But New York city Council Speaker Christine Quinn and Public Safety Committee Chair Peter F. Vallone, Jr., have pointed out in a letter to NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly that archiving in a database information about persons who are innocent of wrongdoing "raises significant privacy right concerns and suggests that these innocent people are more likely to be targeted in future criminal investigations." And the gross racial disparities in the population subject to a police stop suggest that it will be black and brown New Yorkers who will be implicated without legal justification in the those future criminal investigations. No police department in New York State should maintain a database of innocent New Yorkers. This bill would prohibit the police from entering into an electronic database personal information - such as name, social security number, and address - of innocent individuals who are stopped by the police and released without further legal action taken against them. This statutory prohibition is needed to protect the privacy and due process rights of the hundreds of thousands of innocent New Yorkers who are stopped and released each year. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to State. LOCAL FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Nominal administrative fees for change. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately. FOOTNOTE: (1) According to NYPD data provided to the New York City Council, the police in 2008 stopped 531/159 New Yorkers, 88 percent of whom were released without further legal action taken. Of those stopped, 51 percent were black, 32 percent were Latino, and 11 percent were white. In 2007, 468,732 New Yorkers were stopped by the police, 87 percent of whom were innocent of wrongdoing. Of those stopped, 52 percent were black, 32 percent were Latino, and 11 percent were white. In 2006, 508,540 New Yorkers were stopped by the police, 90 percent of whom were innocent of wrongdoing. Of those stopped, 53 percent were black, 29 percent were Latino, and 11 percent were white. In 2005, 399,043 New Yorkers were stopped by the police, 88 percent of whom were innocent of wrongdoing. Of those stopped, 49 percent were black, 29 percent were Latino, and 10 percent were white.
S7945A-2009 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
7945--A
Cal. No. 861 I N SENATE May 25, 2010
Introduced by Sens. ADAMS, ESPADA, PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes - reported favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second report, ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to temporary questioning of persons in public places in cities with a population of one million or more
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 140.50 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:
4. IN CITIES WITH A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE, INFORMATION THAT ESTABLISHES THE PERSONAL IDENTITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS BEEN STOPPED, QUESTIONED AND/OR FRISKED BY A POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER, SUCH AS THE NAME, ADDRESS OR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF SUCH PERSON, SHALL NOT BE RECORDED IN A COMPUTERIZED OR ELECTRONIC DATABASE IF THAT INDIVIDUAL IS RELEASED WITHOUT FURTHER LEGAL ACTION; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL NOT PROHIBIT POLICE OFFICERS OR PEACE OFFI CERS FROM INCLUDING IN A COMPUTERIZED OR ELECTRONIC DATABASE GENERIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AN INDIVIDUAL, SUCH AS RACE AND GENDER, WHO HAS BEEN STOPPED, QUESTIONED AND/OR FRISKED BY A POLICE OFFICER OR PEACE OFFICER.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD17469-02-0

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus