Relates to the cost effectiveness of consultant contracts by state agencies; defines "consultant services".
Sponsor: Bronson / Multi-sponsor(s): Jacobs, McEneny, Rivera P, Sweeney / Co-sponsor(s): Lupardo, Jaffee, Maisel, Galef, Colton, Roberts, Rivera N, Boyland, DenDekker, Englebright
Law Section: State Finance Law / Law: Amd S163, St Fin L
Sponsor: Bronson / Multi-sponsor(s): Jacobs, McEneny, Rivera P, Sweeney / Co-sponsor(s): Lupardo, Jaffee, Maisel, Galef, Colton, Roberts, Rivera N, Boyland, DenDekker, Englebright
Law Section: State Finance Law / Law: Amd S163, St Fin L
A5128B-2011 Actions
- Jun 21, 2012: substituted by s7782
- Jun 19, 2012: amended on third reading (t) 5128c
- Jun 19, 2012: vote reconsidered - restored to third reading
- Jun 19, 2012: RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 19, 2012: recalled from senate
- May 16, 2012: REFERRED TO FINANCE
- May 16, 2012: delivered to senate
- May 16, 2012: passed assembly
- May 9, 2012: amended on third reading 5128b
- Jan 4, 2012: ordered to third reading cal.176
- Jan 4, 2012: RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jan 4, 2012: DIED IN SENATE
- Jun 16, 2011: REFERRED TO RULES
- Jun 16, 2011: delivered to senate
- Jun 16, 2011: passed assembly
- Jun 14, 2011: ordered to third reading rules cal.175
- Jun 14, 2011: rules report cal.175
- Jun 14, 2011: reported
- Jun 13, 2011: reported referred to rules
- Jun 7, 2011: reported referred to ways and means
- Mar 7, 2011: print number 5128a
- Mar 7, 2011: amend and recommit to governmental operations
- Feb 14, 2011: referred to governmental operations
A5128B-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
5128--B
Cal. No. 176 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N ASSEMBLY February 14, 2011
Introduced by M. of A. BRONSON, LUPARDO, JAFFEE, MAISEL, GALEF, COLTON, ROBERTS, N. RIVERA, BOYLAND -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. JACOBS, McENENY, P. RIVERA, SWEENEY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee - ordered to a third reading -- advanced to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the state finance law, in relation to the cost effec tiveness of consultant contracts by state agencies THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 163 of the state finance law is amended by adding a new subdivision 15 to read as follows:
15. CONSULTANT SERVICES. A. BEFORE A STATE AGENCY ENTERS INTO A CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES WHICH IS ANTICIPATED TO COST MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN A TWELVE MONTH PERIOD THE STATE AGENCY SHALL CONDUCT A COST COMPARISON REVIEW TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONSULTANT CAN BE PERFORMED AT EQUAL OR LOWER COST BY UTILIZING STATE EMPLOYEES, UNLESS THE CONTRACT MEETS ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH IN PARAGRAPH B OF THIS SUBDIVISION. AS USED IN THIS SECTION, THE TERM "CONSULTANT SERVICES" SHALL MEAN ANY CONTRACT ENTERED INTO BY A STATE AGENCY FOR ANALYSIS, EVALUATION, RESEARCH, TRAINING, DATA PROCESSING, COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, ENGINEERING, ARCHITEC TURE, ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH SERVICES, MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, ACCOUNT ING, AUDITING, OR SIMILAR SERVICES, BUT SHALL NOT INCLUDE LEGAL SERVICES OR SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH LITIGATION INCLUDING EXPERT WITNESSES AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC WORKS. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SUBDIVISION, THE COSTS OF PERFORMING THE SERVICES BY STATE EMPLOYEES SHALL INCLUDE ANY SALARY, PENSION COSTS, OR OTHER BENE FITS INCLUDING ANY INCREMENTAL COSTS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR EQUIPMENT, FACILITIES OR OTHER OVERHEAD. THE COSTS OF CONSULTANT SERVICES SHALL EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD08162-03-2
A. 5128--B 2 INCLUDE THE TOTAL COST OF THE CONTRACT PLUS ANY COSTS INCURRED BY THE AGENCY IN ADMINISTERING THE CONTRACT OVER AND ABOVE THE COSTS WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN INCURRED BY THE AGENCY IF SUCH SERVICES HAD BEEN PERFORMED BY STATE EMPLOYEES. THE COST COMPARISON SHALL BE EXPRESSED WHERE FEASIBLE AS AN HOURLY RATE, OR WHERE SUCH A CALCULATION IS NOT FEASIBLE, AS A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR THE ANTICIPATED TERM OF THE CONTRACT. B. A COST COMPARISON SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED IF:
(I) THE SERVICES ARE INCIDENTAL TO THE PURCHASE OF REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY; OR (II) THE CONTRACT IS NECESSARY IN ORDER TO AVOID A CONFLICT OF INTER EST ON THE PART OF THE AGENCY OR ITS EMPLOYEES; OR (III) THE SERVICES ARE OF SUCH A HIGHLY SPECIALIZED NATURE THAT IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO UTILIZE STATE EMPLOYEES TO PERFORM THEM OR REQUIRE SPECIAL EQUIPMENT THAT IS NOT FEASIBLE FOR THE STATE TO PURCHASE OR LEASE; OR (IV) THE SERVICES ARE OF SUCH AN URGENT NATURE THAT IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO UTILIZE STATE EMPLOYEES; OR (V) THE SERVICES ARE ANTICIPATED TO BE SHORT TERM AND ARE NOT LIKELY TO BE EXTENDED OR REPEATED AFTER THE CONTRACT IS COMPLETED. C. NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE DEEMED TO AUTHORIZE A STATE AGENCY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WHICH IS OTHERWISE PROHIBITED BY LAW. D. ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE COST COMPARISON REQUIRED BY THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE PUBLIC RECORDS SUBJECT TO DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE SIX OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law; provided, however, that the amendments to section 163 of the state finance law made by section one of this act shall not affect the repeal of such section and shall be deemed to repeal there with.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus