Assembly Actions -
Lowercase Senate Actions - UPPERCASE |
|
---|---|
Sep 27, 2013 |
tabled vetoed memo.210 |
Sep 16, 2013 |
delivered to governor |
Jun 18, 2013 |
returned to assembly passed senate 3rd reading cal.1416 substituted for s769 |
Jun 13, 2013 |
referred to investigations and government operations delivered to senate passed assembly |
Jun 11, 2013 |
ordered to third reading rules cal.171 rules report cal.171 reported |
Jun 04, 2013 |
reported referred to rules |
Jan 09, 2013 |
referred to judiciary |
Assembly Bill A73
Vetoed By Governor2013-2014 Legislative Session
Sponsored By
THIELE
Archive: Last Bill Status - Vetoed by Governor
- Introduced
-
- In Committee Assembly
- In Committee Senate
-
- On Floor Calendar Assembly
- On Floor Calendar Senate
-
- Passed Assembly
- Passed Senate
- Vetoed By Governor
- Signed By Governor
Actions
Votes
2013-A73 (ACTIVE) - Details
2013-A73 (ACTIVE) - Bill Text download pdf
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ S. 769 A. 73 2013-2014 Regular Sessions S E N A T E - A S S E M B L Y (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________ IN SENATE -- Introduced by Sen. LAVALLE -- read twice and ordered print- ed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investi- gations and Government Operations IN ASSEMBLY -- Introduced by M. of A. THIELE -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the Indian law, in relation to establishing a procedure to evaluate the claim of the Montaukett Indians for acknowledgment as an Indian tribe by the state of New York THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Legislative findings. The legislature hereby finds that historically it has granted recognition or acknowledgment to Indian groups in the state of New York by an act of the legislature. There have not been any objective standards enacted to consider a request by an Indian group to obtain recognition by the state. The Montaukett Indians seek to be acknowledged or recognized by the state. Such recognition and acknowledgement was questionably removed from the Montaukett Indians in 1910 in the case of PHARAOH V. BENSON, 69 Misc. Rep. 241 (Supreme, Suffolk Co., 1910) affirmed 164 App. Div. 51, affirmed 222 N.Y. 665 when the Montaukett Indians were declared to be extinct. In 1994, the State Supreme Court, in the case of BREAKERS MOTEL, INC. V. SUNBEACH MONTAUK TWO, INC., subsequently described the Pharoah case as being of "ques- tionable propriety". It is the purpose of this act to establish objec- tive criteria for consideration of acknowledgment or recognition which may be used by the legislature in evaluating such request. S 2. The Indian law is amended by adding a new article 11 to read as follows: EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03507-01-3
Comments
Open Legislation is a forum for New York State legislation. All comments are subject to review and community moderation is encouraged.
Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity, hate or toxic speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Attempts to intimidate and silence contributors or deliberately deceive the public, including excessive or extraneous posting/posts, or coordinated activity, are prohibited and may result in the temporary or permanent banning of the user. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday. By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.
Create an account. An account allows you to sign petitions with a single click, officially support or oppose key legislation, and follow issues, committees, and bills that matter to you. When you create an account, you agree to this platform's terms of participation.