Bill S1010-2011

Relates to limited profit housing companies

Relates to limited profit housing companies.

Details

Actions

  • Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
  • Jan 5, 2011: REFERRED TO HOUSING, CONSTRUCTION AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S1010

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four, in relation to limited-profit housing companies and other buildings or structures which received project-based rental assistance

PURPOSE: This bill protects those tenants who live in Mitchell-Lama and project-based Section 8 buildings whose owners have bought out of the Mitchell-Lama program or who no longer have Section 8 contracts with the United States Department of housing and urban Development (HUD).

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: This bill authorizes New York City or any city, town or village in the counties of Westchester, Nassau and Rockland to extend the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (the ETPA) to cover rental buildings which: (1) were owned by limited-profit housing companies which voluntarily dissolved or which dissolve in the future, or (2) were covered by rental assistance contracts between their owners and HUD and such contracts expired or terminated previously or do so in the future. This bill also prevents owners of such buildings from applying for higher initial rents under the ETPA or the New York City Rent Stabilization Law than were previously charged to their tenants.

Section 1 of this bill sets forth Legislative findings and declaration of emergency.

Section 2 of the bill amends Section 5 of Section 4 of Chapter 576 of the laws of 1974 constituting the emergency tenant protection act of 1974 by adding a new subdivision c to set rents for buildings completed after January 1, 1974 as the rents charged on January 1, 2007, as subsequently adjusted by rent regulation laws. Furthermore, this section clarifies that the rent setting language with a base date of January 1, 2007, will supersede and agreement made between a tenant and landlord whether in a lease or another agreement.

Section 3 of the legislation makes it clear that "unique or peculiar" circumstances rent increased authorized by the New York City rent stabilization law and the Emergency Tenant Protection Act are not applicable to Mitchell-Lama, project based or Section 8 buildings. Whether the buildings were completed before or after January 1, 1974.

Section 4 sets forth an immediate effective date and provides that the law applies to housing accommodations located in buildings or structures-owned by housing companies that dissolved on, before or after such date and to housing accommodations in buildings or structures that were covered projects and had contracts for rental assistance that expired or were terminated on, before, or after such date; provided that the amendments to section 5 of the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four made by section two of this act shall expire on the same date as such act expires and shall not affect the expiration of such act as provided in Section 17 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974.

JUSTIFICATION: Many limited-profit housing companies are exercising their option to buy-out of the Mitchell-Lama program. Likewise, HUD contracts with the owners of rental buildings for Section 8 assistance are expiring, being terminated or not being renewed. Existing middle income tenants in Mitchell-Lama and Section 8 housing are faced with eviction if they cannot afford new market rents. Extending the ETPA these buildings will ensure that existing tenants can continue to afford to live in their current apartments. ETPA coverage will also enable building owners to more readily be eligible for rent increases under annual ETPA guidelines.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2010: S.3326D - Died Housing

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Most costs of administration of ETPA and rent stabilization are covered by per unit fees charged to property owners.

EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately and shall apply to Mitchell-Lama buildings that bought out of the program in the past or do so in the future and buildings with Section 8 contracts that ended previously or that do so in the future.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 1010 2011-2012 Regular Sessions IN SENATE (PREFILED) January 5, 2011 ___________
Introduced by Sens. STEWART-COUSINS, ADAMS, ADDABBO, DIAZ, DILAN, HASSELL-THOMPSON, HUNTLEY, KLEIN, KRUEGER, PARKER, PERALTA, PERKINS, SAVINO, SERRANO, SQUADRON, STAVISKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Housing, Construction and Community Development AN ACT to amend the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seven- ty-four, in relation to limited-profit housing companies and other buildings or structures which received project-based rental assistance THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Legislative findings and declaration of emergency. The legislature hereby finds and declares that the serious public emergency which led to the enactment of the existing laws regulating residential rents and evictions continues to exist; that such laws would better serve the public interest if certain changes were made thereto, includ- ing extending to certain cities, towns and villages the authority to provide for the regulation of rents and evictions with regard to housing accommodations that cease or have ceased to be regulated pursuant to article 2 of the private housing finance law, known as the Mitchell-Lama law, or pursuant to project-based section eight contracts entered into with the federal government. The legislature further recognizes that severe disruption of the rental housing market has occurred and threatens to be exacerbated as a result of the abrupt termination of rent and eviction regulation when buildings exit the Mitchell-Lama program or when buildings cease to be subject to project-based section eight contracts. The situation had permitted speculative and profiteering practices and has brought about the loss of vital and irreplaceable affordable housing for working persons and families.
The legislature therefore declares that in order to prevent uncertain- ty, potential hardship and dislocation of tenants living in housing accommodations subject to government regulations as to rentals and continued occupancy as well as those not subject to such regulations, the provisions of this act are necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The necessity in the public interest for the provisions hereinafter enacted is hereby declared as a matter of legis- lative determination. S 2. Section 5 of section 4 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974 consti- tuting the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four is amended by adding a new subdivision c to read as follows: C. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS SECTION, NOTHING SHALL PREVENT THE DECLARATION OF AN EMERGENCY PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE OF THIS ACT FOR RENTAL HOUSING ACCOMMODATIONS LOCATED IN BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES COMPLETED OR SUBSTANTIALLY RENOVATED AS FAMILY UNITS ON OR AFTER JANUARY FIRST, NINETEEN HUNDRED SEVENTY-FOUR: (I) WHICH HAVE OR HAD BEEN OWNED, LEASED OR OPERATED BY A COMPANY ESTABLISHED OR OPERATING UNDER ARTICLE TWO OF THE PRIVATE HOUSING FINANCE LAW, OTHER THAN A MUTU- AL COMPANY, AND WHICH ARE NO LONGER OWNED, LEASED OR OPERATED BY SUCH COMPANY BY REASON OF A VOLUNTARY DISSOLUTION PURSUANT TO SECTION THIR- TY-FIVE OF SUCH LAW OR (II) WHICH WERE DEFINED AS COVERED PROJECTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 8 OF THE UNITED STATES HOUSING ACT OF NINETEEN THIR- TY-SEVEN, AS AMENDED, OR ANY SUCCESSOR STATUTE, AND ANY REGULATIONS PROMULGATED THEREUNDER IN WHICH RENTAL HOUSING ACCOMMODATIONS RECEIVED PROJECT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO CONTRACTS WITH THE OWNERS OF SUCH BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES WHICH EXPIRED OR WERE TERMINATED. THE INITIAL LEGAL REGULATED RENT FOR HOUSING ACCOMMODATIONS LOCATED IN BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURES THAT HAVE OR HAD BEEN OWNED, LEASED OR OPERATED BY HOUSING COMPANIES OR THAT WERE COVERED PROJECTS PREVIOUSLY REGULATED UNDER THE PRIVATE HOUSING FINANCE LAW OR UNDER FEDERAL LAW, SHALL BE THE RENT CHARGED TO AND PAID BY THE TENANT IN OCCUPANCY ON JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND SEVEN OR, FOR ACCOMMODATIONS VACANT ON SUCH DATE, THE MOST RECENT RENT CHARGED TO AND PAID BY A TENANT PRIOR TO SUCH DATE, INCLUD- ING ANY INCOME-RELATED SURCHARGES, AS ADJUSTED BY ALL APPLICABLE GUIDE- LINES INCREASES AND OTHER INCREASES AUTHORIZED BY LAW, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY WRITTEN LEASE OR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TENANT AND THE LANDLORD ESTABLISHING OR AGREEING TO ANY INCREASES IN RENT ON OR AFTER JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND SEVEN, PROVIDED NO LANDLORD SHALL BE REQUIRED TO REFUND ANY RENT PAID BY A TENANT IN EXCESS OF SUCH ADJUSTED RENT. S 3. The provisions of subdivision a of section 9 of the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four or of subdivision a of section 26-513 of the administrative code of the city of New York shall not apply to any housing accommodation which became subject to the emer- gency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four pursuant to the provisions of subdivision c of section 5 of section 4 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974, as added by section two of this act, or to any such housing accommodation otherwise subject to the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four by reason of its location in a building completed or substantially renovated as family units prior to January first, nineteen hundred seventy-four. S 4. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to housing accommodations located in buildings or structures owned by housing companies that dissolved on, before or after such date and to housing accommodations in buildings or structures that were covered projects and had contracts for rental assistance that expired or were terminated on,
before or after such date; provided that the amendments to section 5 of the emergency tenant protection act of nineteen seventy-four made by section two of this act shall expire on the same date as such act expires and shall not affect the expiration of such act as provided in section 17 of chapter 576 of the laws of 1974.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus