Prohibits cell phone service providers from requiring a customer to renew his or her service plan when adding a new phone line to such plan; and prohibits such provider from extending the time of services originally agreed to under contract.
Sponsor: DILAN
Committee: CONSUMER PROTECTION
Law Section: General Business Law
Law: Add S390-d, Gen Bus L
Law Section: General Business Law
Law: Add S390-d, Gen Bus L
S1346-2011 Actions
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
- Jan 6, 2011: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
S1346-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S1346 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law, in relation to protecting the rights of cell phone users PURPOSE: Eliminates charges for the cancellation of an additional phone line and allows for the addition of a new phone line without renewing the original contract. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill adds a new Section 390-d to the General Business Law, which provides that cell phone service providers cannot cause a user to extend their existing contract simply because they have added an additional line to their current plan. This section also prohibits cell phone providers from charging a user for canceling a phone line from their account, as long as the primary line is kept active. EXISTING LAW: None. JUSTIFICATION: Cell phones have become almost as common as household phones. Most couples and families purchase contracts and add additional lines for their loved ones, so they can keep in touch. It is often the case that lines are added to a customer's existing contract (a child becomes a teenager, or a single adult becomes involved in a relationship), and just as frequently, lines are canceled (a couple breaks up, or a child graduates college and gets their own phone). Cell phone providers currently charge customers a cancellation fee when they drop an additional line which was added to their primary phone line. Similarly, it is standard practice by most cell phone providers to require that customers, when adding an additional phone line to their contract, cause an automatic renewal of their contract. The monthly cost for cell phone service, the additional charges that are frequently incurred, and the length of the cell phone contracts, are all quite extensive. Customers should not have to pay for the addition or removal of a line, as long as they maintain their main line. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2009-10 - S.1079/A.4954 - Passed Senate 2007/08 - S.1497/A.6996 - Referred to Consumer Protection 2005/06 - S.8493/A.12081 - Referred to Consumer Affairs & Protection FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.
S1346-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
1346
2011-2012 Regular Sessions
I N SENATE
January 6, 2011
___________
Introduced by Sens. DILAN, DIAZ, HASSELL-THOMPSON, PARKER -- read twice
and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee
on Consumer Protection
AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to protecting the
rights of cell phone users
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The general business law is amended by adding a new section
390-d to read as follows:
S 390-D. CELL PHONE USERS' RIGHTS TO NOT RENEW. 1. ANY PERSON, FIRM,
CORPORATION, OR OTHER ENTITY THAT HAS ENTERED INTO A CONTRACT WITH A
CUSTOMER TO PROVIDE SUCH CUSTOMER WITH CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES FOR A
FEE, SHALL NOT TREAT THE CUSTOMER'S ADDITION OF A NEW PHONE LINE TO THE
EXISTING SERVICE PLAN AS THE RENEWAL OF SUCH PLAN, AND SHALL NOT EXTEND
THE LENGTH OF TIME OF SERVICES ORIGINALLY AGREED TO UNDER CONTRACT.
2. ANY SUCH PERSON, FIRM, CORPORATION, OR OTHER ENTITY SHALL NOT
IMPOSE ON THE CUSTOMER ANY SERVICE CHARGE, ADDITIONAL FEE OR ANY OTHER
ADDITIONAL COST FOR THE CANCELLATION OF ANY PHONE LINE INCLUDED IN THE
CUSTOMER'S SERVICE PLAN OTHER THAN THE PRIMARY PHONE LINE OF SUCH PLAN.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02669-01-1

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus