Bill S1515-2013

Requires the court to retain one or both alternate jurors until the final verdict is delivered

Requires the court to retain one or both alternate jurors until the final verdict is delivered.

Details

Actions

  • Jan 8, 2014: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
  • Jun 21, 2013: COMMITTED TO RULES
  • Apr 22, 2013: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
  • Apr 17, 2013: 2ND REPORT CAL.
  • Apr 16, 2013: 1ST REPORT CAL.297
  • Jan 9, 2013: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY

Meetings

Calendars

Votes

VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE: - Judiciary - Apr 16, 2013
Ayes (19): Bonacic, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Lanza, LaValle, Little, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Savino, Ranzenhofer, Zeldin, Sampson, Hassell-Thompson, Adams, Breslin, Dilan, Espaillat, Perkins, Stavisky
Ayes W/R (1): Hoylman
Nays (1): DeFrancisco
Excused (1): Hannon

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S1515

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to retaining alternate jurors until verdicts are returned

PURPOSE: This bill will require the court to retain one or both alternate jurors until the final verdict is delivered.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Amends § 4106 of the civil practice law and rules by requiring the court to retain one or both of the alternate jurors until the final verdict of the case is delivered. In the event that a regular juror becomes unable to perform his or her duty in the process of deliberation, the court will then appoint one of the alternate jurors. The deliberation will recommence as if no deliberation had occurred.

JUSTIFICATION: This bill requires the court to retain alternate jurors for the entire length of trial, as opposed to the current law which allows the court to dismiss the alternate jurors before deliberation. This corrects an oversight that has lead to many unnecessary mistrials and countless dollars wasted on retrials. The bill attempts to reduce costs of trial by preventing mistrials and enhancing judicial economy.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.6361 of 2012, Passed Senate.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 1515 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sen. MARCELLINO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to retain- ing alternate jurors until verdicts are returned THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 4106 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter 336 of the laws of 1972, is amended to read as follows: S 4106. Alternate jurors. Unless the court, in its discretion, orders otherwise, one or two additional jurors, to be known as "alternate jurors", may be drawn upon the request of a party. Such jurors shall be drawn at the same time, from the same source, in the same manner, and have the same qualifications as the regular jurors, and be subject to the same examinations and challenges. They shall be seated with, take the oath with, and be treated in the same manner as the regular jurors[, except that after]. AFTER final submission of the case, the court shall [discharge] SEPARATE the alternate jurors FROM THE REGULAR JURORS FOR DELIBERATIONS, BUT SHALL NOT DISCHARGE EITHER OR BOTH ALTERNATE JURORS UNTIL THE FINAL VERDICT IS DELIVERED. If[, before the final submission of the case,] a regular juror dies, or becomes ill, or for any other reason is unable to perform his OR HER duty[, the court may order him to be discharged and draw the name of an alternate, who shall replace the discharged juror in the jury box, and be treated as if he had been selected as one of the regular jurors] AS A REGULAR JUROR AND IF SUCH INABILITY OCCURS AFTER THE FINAL SUBMISSION OF THE CASE AND PRIOR TO THE DELIVERY OF THE VERDICT, THE COURT SHALL DRAW THE NAME OF AN ALTERNATE WHO SHALL REPLACE SAID REGULAR JUROR. IN THE EVENT THAT AN ALTERNATE JUROR REPLACES A REGULAR JUROR, THE COURT SHALL DIRECT THAT THE JURY COMMENCE DELIBERATIONS ANEW AS IF NO PRIOR DELIBERATIONS OCCURRED. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus