Relates to state reimbursement to counties for amounts paid on behalf of non-resident students in attendance at the fashion institute of technology.
Ayes (62): Adams, Addabbo, Avella, Bonacic, Boyle, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Espaillat, Farley, Felder, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Gipson, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Hoylman, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, Latimer, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Marchione, Martins, Maziarz, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Brien, O'Mara, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Sampson, Sanders, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Tkaczyk, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Nays (1): Ball
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to state reimbursement to counties for amounts paid on behalf of non-resident students in attendance at the fashion institute of technology
PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to alleviate the financial burden on New York State counties from having to pay charge back fees to FIT for upper division programs.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1. Provides that subject to the availability of appropriation, the State shall pay the charge back fees for baccalaureate and masters degree programs to FIT, and in turn, counties will no longer have the authority to pass such costs on to any city, town or village in that county. In the event that the State does not pay, the counties that issue the certificate of residences shall make such payments and the current law shall be controlling
Section 2. Sets for the effective date.
JUSTIFICATION: The Fashion Institute of Technology is a uniquely situated community college FIT relies on funding from three sources, local sponsor's share, state support and student tuition, much like any other community college. However, FIT grants baccalaureate and masters degrees which makes them unique.
Charge back fees are collected as part of an off-set to the local sponsor's share and are paid by counties whose residents choose to attend an out of county community college. Counties may then pass those costs on to cities, towns and villages in such counties
In these trying economic times, counties are finding it difficult, if not impossible, to pay the upper level charge back fees and the burden is falling on the localities. This bill is necessary to alleviate some of the counties' burden and eliminate their need to charge back the localities but to still fund FIT at appropriate and fair levels.
FIT provides a very specialized education in a variety of sought after programs. The Institute has impressive graduation and successful job placement rates and should be financially supported
Therefore, this bill would achieve the goal of fully funding FIT by having the state pick up the charge back costs for the upper division degrees while easing the counties' financial hardships.
It is important to note, that this bill does not provide an unfair advantage to FIT over other community colleges because it keeps in place the counties obligation to pay the lower level charge back fees which are paid to all other community colleges for two year degrees
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2012 S.7152.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Pursuant to appropriation, approximately $10.8M in 2013-14.
EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.
STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 1561--C 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________Introduced by Sens. LAVALLE, FLANAGAN, KENNEDY, LANZA, ZELDIN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Higher Education -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported favorably from said commit- tee and committed to the Committee on Finance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to state reimbursement to counties for amounts paid on behalf of non-resident students in attendance at the fashion institute of technology THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Subdivision 10 of section 6305 of the education law, as added by chapter 170 of the laws of 1994, is amended to read as follows: 10. On or before March thirty-first, nineteen hundred ninety-five and every year thereafter, the state shall reimburse each county which has issued a certificate of residence for any non-resident student in attendance at the fashion institute of technology during the nineteen hundred ninety-three--ninety-four academic year and every year thereaft- er in an amount equal to fifty percent of the actual amount paid by such county on behalf of such students and on or before June first, nineteen hundred ninety-five and every year thereafter, the state shall reimburse each county for the remaining fifty percent of the actual amount paid by each such county on behalf of such students. NOTWITHSTANDING SUBDIVI- SION FIVE OF THIS SECTION, AND SUBJECT TO THE AVAILABILITY OF STATE APPROPRIATIONS FOR STATE FISCAL YEARS TWO THOUSAND FOURTEEN--TWO THOU- SAND FIFTEEN AND THEREAFTER, GENERAL COUNTY CHARGES PAYABLE TO THE FASH- ION INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FOR NON-RESIDENT STUDENTS ENROLLED IN UPPEREXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD02672-05-3 S. 1561--C 2
DIVISION CLASSES SHALL NOT BE CHARGED BACK TO ANY CITY, TOWN OR VILLAGE WITHIN THE COUNTY. PROVIDED, THAT THE COUNTIES HAVE RECEIVED FUNDS EQUAL TO SUCH COSTS FROM THE STATE. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.