Relates to the public safety communications surcharge and amends the distributions of monies collected pursuant to such surcharge and provides for the repeal of certain provisions relating thereto.

---

S1720-2013 Actions

• May 20, 2013: referred to ways and means
• May 20, 2013: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
• May 20, 2013: PASSED SENATE
• May 8, 2013: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
• May 7, 2013: 2ND REPORT CAL.
• May 6, 2013: 1ST REPORT CAL.549
• Feb 5, 2013: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
• Jan 9, 2013: REFERRED TO INVESTIGATIONS AND GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

S1720-2013 Meetings

Finance: May 6, 2013, Investigations and Government Operations: Feb 5, 2013

S1720-2013 Calendars

Active List: May 20, 2013 , Floor Calendar: May 7, 2013 , Floor Calendar: May 8, 2013 , Floor Calendar: May 20, 2013

S1720-2013 Votes

S1720-2013 Memo

BILL NUMBER:S1720

TITLE OF BILL:
An act
to amend the tax law, in relation to the public safety communications
surcharge and repealing
certain provisions of such law relating thereto

PURPOSE:
Specifies what percentage of the public safety communications
surcharge funds shall go to counties and local governments, and what
percentage shall go to the state.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:

Section 1: Repeals Subdivision 6 of section 186-f of the tax law and a
new subdivision 6 is added.

New subdivision 6 specifies that:

58.3% of surcharge funds shall be used for toe provision of grants or
reimbursements to counties for the development, including next
generation 911, consolidation, or operation of public safety
communications systems or networks designed to support interoperable
communications for first responders.

41.7% shall be jointly apportioned to the state police, the New York
State emergency services revolving loan fund, and other uses by the
state.

Section 2: provides the effective date.

JUSTIFICATION:
New York passed a law in 1991 that placed a 70 cent surcharge on cell
phone bills, and in 2002 raised the tax to $1.20 per cell phone.
Funding was intended to be transferred from the state police to local
governments to pay for 911 call center services and technology
upgrades. For years, however, the state has been diverting these
funds for other purposes. A 2002 audit, by then Comptroller H. Carl
McCall, identified and criticized the state police for spending the
funds on dry cleaning, conferences, pens, decals, garbage removal and
other miscellaneous items unrelated to 911 call center upgrades. The
law was changed in response, but failed to require that wireless
surcharge funds be diverted to local governments.

The New York State 911 Coordinators Association estimates that New
York State has collected over $1.2 billion in surcharges since 1994,
and of
the $1.90 million collected last year the state transferred only $9.3
million to county governments.

In 2004 Congress passed a law that limited 911 grants to states that
were improperly diverting wireless tax revenue and the U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) has requested and received no
response from New York state officials over the course of two


investigations into the collection and use of funds for the 50 States
and District of Columbia Wireless Enhanced 911 Services.

County governments have been forced to raise sales and/or property
taxes to cover for Albany's improper diversion of these funds. In
addition to being irresponsible, such improper allocation of funds
may be illegal. For example, the Tennessee Attorney General recently
concluded that raiding of 911 funds in that state was illegal based
on the Federal Enhance 911 Act of 1994.

Removing discretion from the state in deciding how wireless surcharge
funds will be allocated will ensure local governments receive the
funds necessary to upgrade 911 call centers and ensure counties are
not forced to raise property and/or sales taxes or fees to cover for
Albany's improper withholding of public safety communications
surcharge funds.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
S5509B of 2011-2012; reported to Finance.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:
This act shall take effect on the first of April next succeeding the
date on which it shall have become law.

S1720-2013 Text

                      S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
  ________________________________________________________________________

                                    1720

                         2013-2014 Regular Sessions

                              I N  SENATE

                                 (PREFILED)

                               January 9, 2013
                                 ___________

  Introduced  by Sens. GRISANTI, GALLIVAN, GOLDEN, LARKIN, MAZIARZ -- read
    twice and ordered printed, and when printed to  be  committed  to  the
    Committee on Investigations and Government Operations

  AN  ACT  to amend the tax law, in relation to the public safety communi-
    cations surcharge and repealing certain provisions of such law  relat-
    ing thereto

    THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
  BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:


    Section 1. Subdivision 6 of section 186-f of the tax law  is  REPEALED
  and a new subdivision 6 is added to read as follows:

    6.  DISTRIBUTION.  THE  MONIES COLLECTED FROM THE SURCHARGE IMPOSED BY
  THIS SECTION SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED IN THE FOLLOWING MANNER:

    (A) FIFTY-EIGHT  AND  THREE-TENTHS  PERCENT  SHALL  BE  USED  FOR  THE
  PROVISION  OF  GRANTS OR REIMBURSEMENTS TO COUNTIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT,
  CONSOLIDATION, OR OPERATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS  SYSTEMS  OR
  NETWORKS  DESIGNED TO SUPPORT STATEWIDE INTEROPERABLE COMMUNICATIONS FOR
  FIRST RESPONDERS, INCLUDING  NEXT  GENERATION  911,  TO  BE  DISTRIBUTED
  PURSUANT  TO STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE STATE. ANNUAL GRANTS
  MAY CONSIDER COSTS BORNE BY A MUNICIPALITY RELATED TO  THE  ISSUANCE  OF
  LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS BONDS PURSUANT TO SECTION TWENTY-FOUR
  HUNDRED  THIRTY-TWO OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW, WHEN THE MUNICIPALITY
  HAS QUALIFIED AS AN APPROVED PARTICIPANT IN  A  STATEWIDE  INTEROPERABLE
  COMMUNICATIONS  SYSTEM  UNDER THE STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ISSUED BY THE
  STATE, AND MAINTAINS COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES.  THE
  GRANT  AMOUNT WILL BE PRESCRIBED PURSUANT TO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE MUNI-
  CIPALITY, AND MAY NOT EXCEED THIRTY PERCENT OF THE ANNUAL COST BORNE  BY
  THE MUNICIPALITY IN RELATION TO SUCH BONDS; AND
    (B)  FORTY-ONE  AND SEVEN-TENTHS PERCENT SHALL BE JOINTLY APPORTIONED,
  PURSUANT TO RULES AND REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY THE  COMMISSIONER,  TO:

  (I) THE STATE POLICE, (II) THE NEW YORK STATE EMERGENCY SERVICES REVOLV-

   EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                        [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                             LBD02747-01-3

 S. 1720                             2

  ING LOAN FUND, (III) PROVIDE FOR THE COSTS OF DEBT SERVICE FOR BONDS AND
  NOTES  ISSUED  TO  FINANCE  EXPEDITED DEPLOYMENT FUNDING PURSUANT TO THE
  PROVISIONS OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED THIRTY-THREE OF THE COUNTY  LAW  AND
  SECTION SIXTEEN HUNDRED EIGHTY-NINE-H OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW, AND
  (IV)  PROVIDE  FOR SERVICES AND EXPENSES THAT SUPPORT THE OPERATIONS AND
  MISSION OF THE DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY  SERVICES  AS
  APPROPRIATED BY THE LEGISLATURE.
    S  2. This act shall take effect on the first of April next succeeding
  the date on which it shall have become a law;  provided,  however,  that
  effective immediately, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule
  or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effec-
  tive  date  is  authorized  and  directed to be made and completed on or
  before such effective date.