Relates to the notification of certain relatives prior to the placement of children.
Sponsor: GOLDEN / Co-sponsor(s): AVELLA, DEFRANCISCO, HASSELL-THOMPSON, PARKER, STEWART-COUSINS / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Domestic Relations Law / Law: Amd S72, Dom Rel L
Sponsor: GOLDEN / Co-sponsor(s): AVELLA, DEFRANCISCO, HASSELL-THOMPSON, PARKER, STEWART-COUSINS / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Domestic Relations Law / Law: Amd S72, Dom Rel L
S1749C-2011 Actions
- Jun 18, 2012: referred to judiciary
- Jun 18, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 18, 2012: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 5, 2012: AMENDED ON THIRD READING (T) 1749C
- Jun 4, 2012: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- May 31, 2012: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- May 31, 2012: AMENDED 1749B
- May 30, 2012: 1ST REPORT CAL.917
- May 14, 2012: PRINT NUMBER 1749A
- May 14, 2012: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO AGING
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO AGING
- Jan 12, 2011: REFERRED TO AGING
S1749C-2011 Calendars
Active List: Jun 11, 2012 , Active List: Jun 18, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 6, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 11, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 12, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 13, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 14, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 18, 2012S1749C-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Aging
- May 30, 2012
Ayes (11): Ball, Farley, Golden, LaValle, Robach, Zeldin, Valesky, Addabbo, Avella, Stavisky, Hassell-Thompson
Excused (1): Diaz
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 18, 2012
Ayes (56): Addabbo, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Storobin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (6): Adams, Alesi, Espaillat, Huntley, O'Mara, Perkins
S1749C-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S1749C TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the notification of certain relatives prior to the placement of children SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 - amends section 72 of the domestic relations law, to include a relative within the third degree of consanguinity, who resides within the state, as suitable for emergency placement of a child, if the court makes a finding of extraordinary circumstances. Section 2 - Effective date. JUSTIFICATION: Too often in our current system, children are placed in foster care even though there may be relatives whose homes are available for placement, and where the child can receive a safe and nurturing environment. This bill will help increase the options for placement in a manner that allows families to remain intact while reducing further trauma for children placed in the foster care system. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.5968 - 2007 - Referred to Rules S.5968A - 2008 - Referred to Aging S.2033 - 2010 - Referred to Aging, Third Reading FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.
S1749C-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
1749--C
Cal. No. 917 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE January 12, 2011
Introduced by Sens. GOLDEN, AVELLA, DeFRANCISCO, HASSELL-THOMPSON, PARK ER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Aging -- recommitted to the Committee on Aging in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said commit tee -- reported favorably from said committee, ordered to first report, amended on first report, ordered to a second report, and to be reprinted as amended, retaining its place in the order of second report -- ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading
AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to the notifica tion of certain relatives prior to the placement of children
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 2 of section 72 of the domestic relations law, as added by chapter 657 of the laws of 2003, is amended to read as follows:
2. (a) Where a grandparent or the grandparents of a minor child, residing within this state, OR RELATIVE WHO IS RELATED TO A PARENT WITH IN THE THIRD DEGREE OF CONSANGUINITY OR THROUGH MARRIAGE OR ADOPTION, RESIDING IN THIS STATE can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the court the existence of extraordinary circumstances, such grandparent [or], grandparents OR RELATIVE of such child may apply to the supreme court by commencing a special proceeding or for a writ of habeas corpus to have such child brought before such court, or may apply to family court pursuant to subdivision (b) of section six hundred fifty-one OR SECTION SIX HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE of the family court act; and on the return there of, the court, by order, after due notice to the parent or any other person or party having the care, custody, and control of such child, to be given in such manner as the court shall prescribe, may make such directions as the best interests of the child may require, for custody EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD04228-10-2
S. 1749--C 2 rights for such grandparent [or], grandparents OR RELATIVE in respect to such child. An extended disruption of custody, as such term is defined in this section, shall constitute an extraordinary circumstance. (b) For the purposes of this section "extended disruption of custody" shall include, but not be limited to, a prolonged separation of the respondent parent and the child for at least twenty-four continuous months, during which TIME the parent voluntarily relinquished care and control of the child and the child resided in the household of the peti tioner grandparent [or], grandparents OR RELATIVE, provided, however, that the court may find that extraordinary circumstances exist should the prolonged separation have lasted for less than twenty-four months. (c) Nothing in this section shall limit the ability of parties to enter into consensual custody agreements absent the existence of extraordinary circumstances.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus