Provides for legislative review of rules and regulations and allows the legislature to invalidate regulations that are not consistent with the legislative intent.
Sponsor: SEWARD / Co-sponsor(s): DEFRANCISCO, GOLDEN, JOHNSON, LARKIN, LITTLE, O'MARA, RANZENHOFER, SALAND, YOUNG / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Constitution, Concurrent Resolutions to Amend / Law: Amd Art 4 S8, Constn
Sponsor: SEWARD / Co-sponsor(s): DEFRANCISCO, GOLDEN, JOHNSON, LARKIN, LITTLE, O'MARA, RANZENHOFER, SALAND, YOUNG / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Constitution, Concurrent Resolutions to Amend / Law: Amd Art 4 S8, Constn
S2381-2011 Actions
- Feb 8, 2012: OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
- Jan 9, 2012: TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR OPINION
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
- Jan 4, 2012: returned to senate
- Jan 4, 2012: died in assembly
- Jun 7, 2011: referred to judiciary
- Jun 7, 2011: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 7, 2011: PASSED SENATE
- Apr 27, 2011: OPINION REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
- Mar 3, 2011: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Mar 2, 2011: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Mar 1, 2011: 1ST REPORT CAL.124
- Jan 25, 2011: TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR OPINION
- Jan 19, 2011: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
S2381-2011 Meetings
Judiciary: Mar 1, 2011S2381-2011 Calendars
Active List: Jun 7, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 2, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 3, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 7, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 8, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 9, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 10, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 14, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 15, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 16, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 21, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 22, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 23, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 24, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 28, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 29, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 30, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Mar 31, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 4, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 5, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 6, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 11, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 12, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Apr 13, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 2, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 3, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 4, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 9, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 10, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 11, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 16, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 17, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 18, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 23, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 24, 2011 , Floor Calendar: May 25, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Jun 1, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Jun 2, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Jun 6, 2011 , Floor Calendar: Jun 7, 2011S2381-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Judiciary
- Mar 1, 2011
Ayes (17): Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Lanza, LaValle, Little, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Ranzenhofer, Saland, Zeldin, Hassell-Thompson, Breslin, Dilan, Espaillat, Perkins
Ayes W/R (2): Adams, Stavisky
Nays (4): Gianaris, Krueger, Serrano, Squadron
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 7, 2011
Ayes (49): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Kruger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Stewart-Cousin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Nays (13): Duane, Espaillat, Gianaris, Huntley, Klein, Krueger, Montgomery, Perkins, Rivera, Savino, Serrano, Squadron, Stavisky
S2381-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S2381 TITLE OF BILL: CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY proposing an amendment to section 8 of article 4 of the constitution, in relation to legislative review of rules and regulations PURPOSE: To allow the legislature to invalidate regulations that are not consistent with legislative intent or which are likely to have a substantial unanticipated fiscal impact on the state or local governments. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: This bill will amend the Constitution to allow the legislature by majority vote of both houses to invalidate regulations not consistent with the legislative intent or which are likely to have a substantial unanticipated fiscal impact on the state or local governments. EXISTING LAW: There is no provision similar to this in the New York Constitution. JUSTIFICATION: The intent of the legislature in passing a particular statute must be the paramount concern in drafting rules and regulations implementing the statute. The will of the legislature should not be altered or circumvented by state agencies drafting rules and regulations. When rules and regulations exceed or stray from the legislative intent, there may be unanticipated burdens placed on the constituents of the legislators which voted for the legislation at issue. In addition, in these tight financial times, it is also important that regulations do not impose costs on the state or local governments which were not anticipated by the legislature at the time of passage of the legislation which the regulations are implementing. This bill would allow the legislature to identify and eliminate regulations that the legislature never intended which may impose needless burdens and costs on consumers, businesses or government. Specifically, this bill would amend the Constitution to authorize the legislature to review any rule or regulation to determine if it is consistent with the intent of the legislature or if it would have a substantial unanticipated fiscal impact on the state or local governments. Upon making such a finding through a concurrent resolution to the governor and the head of the appropriate agency, the agency would be required to amend or withdraw the regulation. In the event that the agency fails to take such action within thirty days, the legislature may vote to invalidate such regulation. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.3048 of 2009-10; S.6982 of 2008 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That the foregoing amendment be referred to the first regular legislative session convening after the next succeeding general election of members of the assembly, and, in conformity with section 1 of article 19 of the constitution, be published for 3 months previous to the time of such election.
S2381-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
2381 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE January 19, 2011
Introduced by Sens. SEWARD, DeFRANCISCO, GOLDEN, JOHNSON, LARKIN, LITTLE, O'MARA, RANZENHOFER, SALAND -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY proposing an amendment to section 8 of article 4 of the constitution, in relation to legislative review of rules and regulations
Section 1. Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That section 8 of arti cle 4 of the constitution be amended to read as follows:
S 8. No rule or regulation made by any state department, board, bureau, officer, authority or commission, except such as relates to the organization or internal management of a state department, board, bureau, authority or commission shall be effective until it is filed in the office of the department of state. The legislature shall provide for the speedy publication of such rules and regulations by appropriate laws. THE LEGISLATURE MAY REVIEW ANY RULE OR REGULATION TO DETERMINE IF THE RULE OR REGULATION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE LEGISLATURE AS EXPRESSED IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE WHICH THE RULE OR REGULATION IS INTENDED TO IMPLEMENT AND/OR TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE RULE OR REGU LATION IS LIKELY TO HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL FISCAL IMPACT ON THE STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHICH WAS NOT ANTICIPATED BY THE LEGISLATURE AT THE TIME OF THE PASSAGE OF THE LEGISLATION. UPON A FINDING THAT AN EXISTING OR PROPOSED RULE OR REGULATION IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH LEGISLATIVE INTENT AND/OR A FINDING OF A SUBSTANTIAL UNANTICIPATED FISCAL IMPACT ON THE STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, THE LEGISLATURE SHALL TRANSMIT THIS FINDING IN THE FORM OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION TO THE GOVERNOR AND THE HEAD OF THE STATE DEPARTMENT, BOARD, BUREAU, AUTHORITY OR COMMISSION WHICH PROMULGATED, OR PLANS TO PROMULGATE, THE RULE OR REGULATION. THE STATE DEPARTMENT, BOARD, BUREAU, AUTHORITY OR COMMISSION SHALL HAVE THIRTY DAYS TO AMEND OR WITHDRAW THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED RULE OR REGULATION. IF THE STATE DEPARTMENT, BOARD, BUREAU, AUTHORITY OR COMMISSION DOES NOT AMEND OR WITHDRAW THE EXISTING OR PROPOSED RULE OR REGULATION, THE LEGISLATURE MAY INVALIDATE THAT RULE OR REGULATION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD89064-01-1
S. 2381 2 OR MAY PROHIBIT THAT PROPOSED RULE OR REGULATION, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FROM TAKING EFFECT BY A VOTE OF A MAJORITY OF THE AUTHORIZED MEMBERSHIP OF EACH HOUSE IN FAVOR OF A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR INVALI DATION OR PROHIBITION, AS THE CASE MAY BE, OF THE RULE OR REGULATION.
S 2. Resolved (if the Assembly concur), That the foregoing amendment be referred to the first regular legislative session convening after the next succeeding general election of members of the assembly, and, in conformity with section 1 of article 19 of the constitution, be published for 3 months previous to the time of such election.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus