Bill S2742B-2013

Includes in the definition of veterinary medicine, the treatment of dental conditions; exempts persons who can treat floating teeth of horses from licensing requirements

Includes in the definition of veterinary medicine, the treatment of dental conditions; exempts persons who can treat floating teeth of horses from licensing requirements.

Details

Actions

  • Jun 17, 2014: SUBSTITUTED BY A8867A
  • May 28, 2014: AMENDED ON THIRD READING 2742B
  • May 19, 2014: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
  • May 14, 2014: 2ND REPORT CAL.
  • May 13, 2014: 1ST REPORT CAL.699
  • Feb 14, 2014: PRINT NUMBER 2742A
  • Feb 14, 2014: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO HIGHER EDUCATION
  • Jan 8, 2014: REFERRED TO HIGHER EDUCATION
  • Jan 23, 2013: REFERRED TO HIGHER EDUCATION

Calendars

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S2742B

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to the practice of veterinary medicine

PURPOSE: This bill is designed to both reduce the potential for animal cruelty by prohibiting untrained persons from performing dental surgery on animals and to bring the NY Veterinary Practice Act into compliance with most of our neighboring states and those states with large racing and equine populations by including animal dentistry within the scope of practice of veterinary medicine. The floating of teeth is specifically excluded from the scope of practice of veterinary medicine.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:

Section 6701 of the education law is amended to include the treatment of dental conditions other than the floating of equine teeth as within the definition of the practice of veterinary medicine.

JUSTIFICATION: When the New York veterinary practice act was first enacted, there was general agreement that the practice of veterinary medicine included all of the veterinary specialties and for many years the practice operated under that assumption.

Recently, the State Racing and Wagering Board attempted to exclude unlicensed "veterinary dentists" from racetracks in the state. The State Education Department's Office of the Professions joined in the effort to prohibit this unlicensed practice. The decision in State Supreme Court in Chris Brown v. NYS Racing and Wagering Bd. was unfavorable and the state appealed the matter. The Appellate Division upheld the lower Court's decision on the grounds that the New York Practice Act, unlike many others, did not include specific reference to dentistry in its definition of veterinary medicine.

The court noted that the New York statute marks a "departure from parallel statutes of sister states in our region. We are guided by the maxim expression unius est exclusion alterius, that the failure of the Legislature to include a matter within a particular statute is an indication that its exclusion was intended." While the State Education Department urged the Court to accept its view that dentistry was within the scope of practice of veterinary medicine, the Court noted that this was a legislative matter for consideration and modification if it was to occur.

It is important to note that most of the states in this region including: Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Maryland and Rhode Island, along with other states with significant equine industries, including: Kentucky, Oklahoma, California, Texas, Montana, Minnesota, Washington and Ohio include dentistry within the scope of veterinary practice.

Currently, there is the potential for pain, discomfort, and in some cases cruelty, to animals treated by minimally trained or even untrained "lay animal dentists" along with evidence of the illegal dispensing of controlled substance pain killers by them. This legislation will free horses from this threat while also recognizing

the longstanding services provided by those who have manually floated equine teeth for many years.

This legislation would in no way hinder those dentists who float equine teeth, who may continue their practice of floating teeth free of regulation.

The New York Practice Act has not been significantly modified in many years, during which many of these states' statutes were enacted or amended. It is therefore appropriate that New York join with similar states in the treatment of animal dentistry by making clear that animal dentistry is within the scope of practice of veterinary medicine. This is especially fitting given the efforts of the Racing and Wagering Board and State Education Department to seek continuity in racing standards through regional and national compacts.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2011, 2012: S.4341/A.6480 Referred to Higher Education This bill is similar in intent to S.6461/A.9562 of 2010.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 2742--B Cal. No. 699 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE January 23, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sens. YOUNG, TKACZYK -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Higher Education -- recommitted to the Committee on Higher Education in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second report, ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of third reading AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to the practice of veter- inary medicine THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 6701 of the education law, as amended by chapter 234 of the laws of 1996, is amended to read as follows: S 6701. Definition of practice of veterinary medicine. The practice of the profession of veterinary medicine is defined as diagnosing, treating, operating, or prescribing for any animal disease, pain, inju- ry, deformity or DENTAL OR physical condition, or the subcutaneous insertion of a microchip intended to be used to identify an animal. "Animal" includes every living creature except a human being. NOTWITH- STANDING THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION, NO PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO INCLUDE THE FLOATING OF EQUINE TEETH AS BEING WITHIN THE PRACTICE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus