Removes the requirement of a pre-sentence investigation when a negotiated sentence of imprisonment has been agreed upon and there will be no sentence of probation imposed.
Sponsor: GOLDEN / Committee: CODES
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S390.20, rpld sub 4 S(a) cl S, CP L
Sponsor: GOLDEN / Committee: CODES
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S390.20, rpld sub 4 S(a) cl S, CP L
S3073-2013 Actions
- Jan 29, 2013: REFERRED TO CODES
S3073-2013 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3073
TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation
to the requirement of preparing pre-sentence reports and the waiver of
such reports under certain circumstances, and to repeal the closing
paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 390.20 of such
law relating to waiver of pre-sentence reports where indeterminate
sentences are to be imposed
PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to save the State money by elimi-
nating the costly requirement of Pre-Sentence Investigations (PSIs) and
related written reports where they serve no useful purpose.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS:
Section 1 of the bill amends subdivision 1 of Criminal Procedure Law
("CPL") section 390.20 to provide that pre-sentence investigation
("PSI") requirement for persons convicted of a felony shall not apply
when a negotiated sentence of imprisonment has been agreed upon by the
parties as the result of a conviction or revocation of a sentence of
probation, and no sentence of probation will be imposed.
Section 2 amends subdivision 2 of CPL section 390.20 to remove the
requirement of a pre-sentence report ("PSR") in the case of a person who
has been convicted of a misdemeanor, even in the circumstances listed in
CPL 390.20(2)(a)-(c).
Section 3 amends CPL section 390.20(4) to provide that where a PSI or
PSR is required by CPL section 390.20(1), it may be waived by mutual
consent of the parties and the judge if a sentence of probation has been
agreed upon or if such a report has been prepared during the previous
twelve- month period. This section further eliminates the prohibition
against allowing a waiver of a PSI or PSR where an indeterminate or
determinate sentence has been imposed, in effect until September 1, 2013
and found in the closing paragraph of CPL section 390.20(4)(a).
Section 4 repeals the provisions of the closing paragraph of CPL section
390.20(4)(a) that go back into effect on September 1, 2013, with the
result that waiver of the PSI is allowed in the event that an indetermi-
nate sentence is imposed.
EXISTING LAW: Current law under section 390.20(1) of the CPL requires a
presiding court to order a pre-sentence investigation of a defendant,
and receive a written report thereon, before pronouncing sentence in any
case in which such defendant is convicted of a felony. Where the defend-
ant has been convicted of a misdemeanor, current law does not require a
pre-sentence report, but there are exceptions to this rule that this
bill eliminates.
Current law, effective until September 13, 2013, prohibits the waiver of
a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and a written report ther-
eon if a determinate or indeterminate sentence of imprisonment is to be
imposed; after September 13, 2013, waiver is not allowed in the case of
an indeterminate sentence only.
JUSTIFICATION: The City proposes to eliminate the costly requirement of
Pre-Sentence Investigations (PSIs) and related written reports where
they would serve no useful purpose. In New York City, there are approxi-
mately 110 probation officers and supervisors dedicated to conducting
such PSIs, but in nearly two-thirds of these cases, the defendant does
not end up under the supervision of the Department of Probation (DoP).
Currently, probation departments are required to conduct PSIS and
prepare a written report on all defendants convicted in felony cases.
The proposed legislation would amend Criminal Procedure Law (CPL)
section 390.20 to provide an exception to this requirement where a nego-
tiated sentence of imprisonment has been reached as a result of a felony
conviction or revocation of a probation sentence, and where probation
will not be imposed under either scenario. Because the purpose of a PSI
is to assist the court with sentencing, whenever a sentence of imprison-
ment has already been agreed upon by plea, a PSI is unnecessary. In the
interest of public safety, probation departments would continue to
prepare PSIs in all other felony cases, including those where a plea
bargain is reached and the defendant is returning to the community
(i.e., probation, fine, conditional discharge). This gives probation
departments an opportunity to provide input to the Court as to whether
the sentence is appropriate.
The bill would also eliminate the need for PSIs in all misdemeanor
cases. (Pursuant to existing CPL section 390.20(2) a PSI is not required
in connection with misdemeanor convictions except for probation-bound
defendants, jail sentences greater than 180 days and consecutive
sentences greater than 90 days.) Instead, when a misdemeanor case
results in a probation sentence, DoP will conduct its own investigation
while the person is under its supervision.
It is important to realize that the existing CPL section 390.20(3)
allows judges to order a PSI in any case where it is appropriate and
necessary. This proposal would not affect that discretion to order a PSI
even if the statute would no longer automatically require one.
Accordingly, the Mayor urges the earliest possible favorable consider-
ation of this proposal by the Legislature.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.5490 of 2011 - Passed Senate 06/18/12
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This bill shall take effect on the 90th day after
becoming law, with provisions.
S3073-2013 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
3073 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N SENATE January 29, 2013
Introduced by Sen. GOLDEN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the require ment of preparing pre-sentence reports and the waiver of such reports under certain circumstances, and to repeal the closing paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 390.20 of such law relating to waiver of pre-sentence reports where indeterminate sentences are to be imposed THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended to read as follows:
1. Requirement for felonies. In any case where a person is convicted of a felony, the court must order a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and it may not pronounce sentence until it has received a written report of such investigation. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY WHEN A NEGOTIATED SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT HAS BEEN AGREED UPON BY THE PARTIES AS A RESULT OF A CONVICTION OR REVOCATION OF A SENTENCE OF PROBATION, AND NO SENTENCE OF PROBATION WILL BE IMPOSED.
S 2. Subdivision 2 of section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 413 of the laws of 1991, paragraph (b) as amended by section 179 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
2. Requirement for misdemeanors. Where a person is convicted of a misdemeanor a pre-sentence report is not required[, but the court maynot pronounce any of the following sentences unless it has ordered apre-sentence investigation of the defendant and has received a writtenreport thereof:(a) A sentence of probation except where the provisions of subpara-graph (ii) of paragraph (a) of subdivision four of this section apply;(b) A sentence of imprisonment for a term in excess of one hundredeighty days;EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD04364-01-3
S. 3073 2(c) Consecutive sentences of imprisonment with terms aggregating morethan ninety days].
S 3. Subdivision 4 of section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chapter 413 of the laws of 1991, the closing paragraph of para graph (a) as amended by chapter 3 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:
4. Waiver. (a) [Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision one ortwo of this section, a] A pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and a written report thereon, WHEN REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION, may be waived by the mutual consent of the parties and with consent of the judge, stated on the record or in writing, whenever:
(i) [A sentence of imprisonment has been agreed upon by the partiesand will be satisfied by the time served, or(ii)] A sentence of probation has been agreed upon by the parties and will be imposed, or [(iii)] (II) A report has been prepared in the preceding twelve months[, or(iv) A sentence of probation is revoked.Provided, however, a pre-sentence investigation of the defendant and awritten report thereon shall not be waived if an indeterminate or deter-minate sentence of imprisonment is to be imposed]. (b) Whenever a pre-sentence investigation and report has been waived pursuant to subparagraph (i)[,] OR (ii) [or (iii)] of paragraph (a) of this subdivision and the court determines that such information would be relevant to the court disposition, a victim impact statement shall be provided in accordance with this section.
S 4. The closing paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chapter 413 of the laws of 1991, is REPEALED.
S 5. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law, provided, however, that the amendments to the closing paragraph of paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 of section 390.20 of the criminal procedure law made by section three of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to subdivision d of section 74 of chapter 3 of the laws of 1995, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section four of this act shall take effect.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus