Bill S3109A-2013

Requires notice from employers to customers of service charges and administrative fees that are not distributed to employees as gratuities

Requires notice from employers to customers of service charges and administrative fees that are not distributed to employees as gratuities.

Details

Actions

  • Jan 8, 2014: REFERRED TO LABOR
  • Apr 25, 2013: PRINT NUMBER 3109A
  • Apr 25, 2013: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LABOR
  • Jan 30, 2013: REFERRED TO LABOR

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S3109A

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the labor law, in relation to requiring notice from employers to customers of service charges and administration fees that are not distributed to employees as gratuities

PURPOSE OF BILL: To codify the past practices of catering hall facilities based on Department of Labor regulations for the imposition of service charges prior to the Court of Appeals decision in Samineto v. World Yacht, Inc,

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Amends section 196-d of the labor law, as added by chapter 1007 of the laws of 1968 creating a new subsection 1 to allow for employers to add a mandatory gratuity so long as the charge is conspicuously disclosed and the full amount of the gratuity is distributed to the employees. Additionally amends the current labor law section 196-d to explicitly state that written notice shall be given to customers that mandatory service charges or any similar administrative fee, are not part of a gratuity if that charge, or only part of that charge is not to be distributed to any employees as a gratuity. The statement shall be written in ordinary language in no smaller than 12 point font on the agreement or contract and in a type size similar to the surrounding text on the check or invoice. Subsection 3 sets forth the requirements for an affirmative defense for an action stemming from events held prior to January 1, 2011 (the effective date of the Department of Labor regulation setting disclosure requirements).

Section two sets the enacting date.

JUSTIFICATION: The Court of Appeals held in Samineto v. World Yacht, Inc., 10 N.Y. 3d 70 (2008) that mandatory service charges may be a charge that is purported to be a gratuity if the reasonable customer would understand such a mandatory charge to be a gratuity. Prior to this decision, owners of catering halls reasonably relied on a 1995 state-wide memorandum of the New York State Department of Labor (consistent with federal law) and numerous subsequent Department Opinion Letters, which confirmed that in the cases of banquets or other special functions, a service charge would not be considered a gratuity. The Samiento decision radically altered this paradigm and subjected catering halls to significant retroactive liability, despite their practice having been consistent with the regulations at the time and in compliance with Department guidance and the holdings of lower state and federal courts.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.62995 (2012)Passed Senate; S.7791 (2012)

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the state.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 3109--A 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE January 30, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sen. MARTINS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the labor law, in relation to requiring notice from employers to customers of service charges and administration fees that are not distributed to employees as gratuities THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 196-d of the labor law, as added by chapter 1007 of the laws of 1968, is amended to read as follows: S 196-d. Gratuities. 1. AN EMPLOYER SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED FROM ADDING A MANDATORY GRATUITY AS LONG AS: (A) THE CHARGE IS CONSPICUOUSLY DISCLOSED TO THE CUSTOMER BEFORE FOOD OR BEVERAGE IS ORDERED; AND (B) NO EMPLOYER OR HIS AGENT OR AN OFFICER OR AGENT OF ANY CORPORATION, SHALL RETAIN ANY PORTION OF SUCH GRATUITY. THE DISCLOSURE SHALL USE ORDINARY LANGUAGE READILY UNDERSTOOD AND SHALL APPEAR IN A TYPE SIZE SIMILAR TO SURROUNDING TEXT. 2. No employer or his agent or an officer or agent of any corporation, or any other person shall demand or accept, directly or indirectly, any part of the gratuities, received by an employee, or retain any part of a gratuity or of any charge purported to be a gratuity for an employee. This provision shall not apply to the checking of hats, coats or other apparel. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed as affecting the allowances from the minimum wage for gratuities in the amount determined in accordance with the provisions of article nineteen of this chapter nor as affecting practices in connection with banquets and other special functions where a fixed percentage of the patron's bill is added for gratuities which are distributed to employees, nor to the sharing of tips by a waiter with a busboy or similar employee. AN EMPLOYER THAT IMPOSES A MANDATORY SERVICE CHARGE, ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, OR ANY OTHER
SIMILAR CHARGE WHICH IS NOT DISTRIBUTED TO EMPLOYEES AS GRATUITIES MUST PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS IN THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES AND ON THE CHECK OR INVOICE THAT THE CHARGE IS NOT A GRATUITY AND WILL NOT BE DISTRIBUTED TO EMPLOYEES WHO PROVIDED SERVICE TO GUESTS, OR IF ONLY A PORTION OF THE CHARGE IS DISTRIBUTED AS GRATUITIES, THE PORTION DISTRIBUTED AS GRATUITIES MUST BE IDENTIFIED. THE WRITTEN NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS IN THE CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES SHALL APPEAR IN A TYPE SIZE NO SMALLER THAN TWELVE POINT TYPE. THE STATEMENTS IN THE CHECK OR INVOICE SHALL USE ORDINARY LANGUAGE READILY UNDERSTOOD AND SHALL APPEAR IN A TYPE SIZE SIMILAR TO SURROUNDING TEXT. 3. NOTWITHSTANDING THE FOREGOING, THERE SHALL BE NO LIABILITY TO ANY ACTION ALLEGING THAT ANY SERVICE CHARGE, ADMINISTRATIVE FEE, OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR CHARGE IMPOSED AS PART OF A BANQUET HELD PRIOR TO JANUARY FIRST, TWO THOUSAND ELEVEN WAS A GRATUITY, IF THE EMPLOYER PROVES AS AN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS WERE MET: (A) THE EMPLOYER OR EMPLOYER'S AGENT DID NOT EXPRESSLY REPRESENT TO THE CUSTOMER THAT THE CHARGE WAS A GRATUITY; (B) THE EMPLOYER CHARGED SALES TAX IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE TAX LAW ON THE CHARGE; (C) THE EMPLOYER INCLUDED THE CHARGE AS PART OF ITS GROSS RECEIPTS, UPON WHICH INCOME TAX WAS CALCULATED; AND (D) THE EMPLOYER PAID FOOD SERVICE WORKERS WAGES SET FORTH IN SECTION SIX HUNDRED FIFTY- TWO OF THIS CHAPTER. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus