This bill has been amended

Bill S3868A-2013

Enacts the "credit privacy in employment act" to prohibit the use of credit information in hiring and employment determinations

Enacts the "credit privacy in employment act" to prohibit the use of consumer credit reports in hiring and employment determinations.

Details

Actions

  • Mar 18, 2013: PRINT NUMBER 3868A
  • Mar 18, 2013: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
  • Feb 25, 2013: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S3868A

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law and the labor law, in relation to the use of credit history for employment purposes

PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to prohibit an employer or potential employer from using an individual's credit history in his or her decision making process to hire, terminate, promote, demote or discipline an employee or possible employee.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: This bill would prohibit an employer from using an individual's credit history in decisions related to hiring, terminating, promoting, demoting or disciplinary actions against employees or potential employees. An employer may use such information if required by state or federal law to use such credit history.

The bill would also require employers, when using a consumer report or investigative consumer report containing credit history information and taking an adverse action based in whole, or in part on such report, shall provide to the job applicant or employee: a) the name, address, and telephone number of such consumer reporting agency; b) a description of the consumer's rights under section 380-b of this article; and c) a reasonable opportunity to respond to any information contained in such report.

JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of this bill is to prohibit an employer's access to certain credit history information in connection with employment decisions, so that those persons whose credit history has been negatively affected by the current economic down turn may become more eligible for those jobs that do exist.

There is no evidence showing a correlation between employee credit history and job performance or tendency to commit fraud. In fact, in 2010, Eric Rosenberg, Director of state Government Relations for Trans-Union, one of the "big three" nationwide credit reporting agencies, told a panel of Oregon legislators examining this issue that, "At this point we don't have any research to show any statistical correlation between what's in somebody's credit report and their job performance or their likelihood to commit fraud."

With the current bad economic climate, many qualified persons, who through no fault of their own, have low credit scores or less than ideal credit histories, have not been able to find work for months or years at a time. In the employment selection process, those who have been out of work the longest may have more deficient credit histories, hence they are less attractive to employers for those employment opportunities that do exist. These individuals are needlessly being disqualified for jobs that they desperately need and which they are qualified for. However, the consumer credit reports put, in many cases, an undeserved questionable mark on individuals who otherwise would be qualified for employment.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2012 - Same as S. 4905-A (Klein) / A. 8070 (Stevenson)

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.

EFFECTIVE DATE: 180th day after it shall have become law.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 3868--A 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE February 25, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sen. KLEIN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer Protection -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the general business law and the labor law, in relation to the use of credit history for employment purposes THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "credit privacy in employment act". S 2. Paragraph 3 of subdivision (a) of section 380-b of the general business law, as amended by chapter 797 of the laws of 1984, is amended to read as follows: (3) To a person whom it has reason to believe intends to use the information (i) in connection with a credit transaction involving the consumer on whom the information is to be furnished and involving the extension of credit to, or review or collection of an account of, the consumer, or (ii) for employment purposes, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-U OF THIS ARTICLE or (iii) in connection with the underwriting of insurance involving the consumer, or (iv) in connection with a determination of the consumer's eligibility for a license or other benefit granted by a governmental instrumentality required by law to consider an applicant's financial responsibility or status, or (v) to a person in connection with a business transaction involving the consumer where the user has a legitimate business need for such information, or (vi) in connection with the rental or lease of a residence. S 3. Section 380-m of the general business law, as amended by chapter 279 of the laws of 2008, is amended to read as follows: S 380-m. Civil liability for negligent noncompliance. Any consumer reporting agency or user of information who or which is negligent in
failing to comply with any requirement imposed under this article, other than a violation of section three hundred eighty-t OR THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-U of this article, with respect to any consumer is liable to that consumer in an amount equal to the sum of: (a) Any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure; (b) In the case of any successful action to enforce any liability under this section, the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney's fees as determined by the court. S 4. Section 380-u of the general business law, as relettered by chap- ter 63 of the laws of 2006, is renumbered section 380-v and a new section 380-u is added to read as follows: S 380-U. USE OF CREDIT HISTORY FOR EMPLOYMENT PURPOSES. (A) NO EMPLOYER, EMPLOYMENT AGENCY, OR LICENSING AGENCY, OR AGENT, REPRESEN- TATIVE OR DESIGNEE THEREOF, SHALL: (1) USE INFORMATION IN THE CREDIT HISTORY OF A JOB APPLICANT OR EMPLOYEE IN CONNECTION WITH OR AS A CRITERION FOR EMPLOYMENT DECISIONS RELATED TO HIRING, TERMINATION, PROMOTION, DEMOTION, DISCIPLINE, COMPEN- SATION, OR THE TERMS, CONDITIONS OR PRIVILEGES OF EMPLOYMENT; OR (2) REQUEST THE JOB APPLICANT'S OR EMPLOYEE'S CREDIT HISTORY FOR SUCH PURPOSE. (B) THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY IF THE EMPLOYER IS REQUIRED BY STATE OR FEDERAL LAW TO USE INDIVIDUAL CREDIT HISTORY FOR EMPLOYMENT PURPOSES. (C) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "CREDIT HISTORY" MEANS ANY WRITTEN OR OTHER COMMUNICATION OF ANY INFORMATION BY A CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY THAT BEARS ON A CONSUMER'S CREDIT WORTHINESS, CREDIT STANDING OR CREDIT CAPACITY. (D) (1) WHEREVER THERE SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, AN APPLI- CATION MAY BE MADE BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK TO A COURT OR JUSTICE HAVING JURISDICTION BY A SPECIAL PROCEEDING TO ISSUE AN INJUNCTION, AND UPON NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE DAYS, TO ENJOIN OR RESTRAIN THE CONTIN- UANCE OF SUCH VIOLATION; AND IF IT SHALL APPEAR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT OR JUSTICE THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS, IN FACT, VIOLATED THIS SECTION, AN INJUNCTION MAY BE ISSUED BY SUCH COURT OR JUSTICE, ENJOINING AND RESTRAINING ANY FURTHER VIOLATION, WITHOUT REQUIRING PROOF THAT ANY PERSON HAS, IN FACT, BEEN INJURED OR DAMAGED THEREBY. IN ANY SUCH PROCEEDING, THE COURT MAY MAKE ALLOWANCES TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH SIX OF SUBDIVISION (A) OF SECTION EIGHTY-THREE HUNDRED THREE OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, AND DIRECT RESTITU- TION. WHENEVER THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE THAT A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION HAS OCCURRED, THE COURT MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL PENALTY OF NOT MORE THAN TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS FOR EACH VIOLATION. IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH PROPOSED APPLICATION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS AUTHORIZED TO TAKE PROOF AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF THE RELEVANT FACTS AND TO ISSUE SUBPOENAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES. (2) ANY PERSON INJURED BY A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION MAY BRING AN ACTION IN HIS OR HER OWN NAME TO ENJOIN SUCH UNLAWFUL ACT OR PRACTICE, AN ACTION TO RECOVER HIS OR HER ACTUAL DAMAGES OR THREE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER, OR BOTH SUCH ACTIONS. THE COURT MAY, IN ITS DISCRETION, INCREASE THE AWARD OF DAMAGES TO AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED THREE TIMES THE ACTUAL DAMAGES UP TO TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS, IF THE COURT FINDS THE DEFENDANT WILLFULLY OR KNOWINGLY VIOLATED THIS ARTI- CLE. IN THE CASE OF ANY SUCCESSFUL ACTION TO ENFORCE THE FOREGOING
LIABILITY, THE COURT MAY AWARD THE COSTS OF THE ACTION TOGETHER WITH REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES. (E) A CONSUMER MAY FILE A COMPLAINT ALLEGING A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SUBDIVISION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO HUNDRED NINETEEN-D OF THE LABOR LAW. S 5. Subdivision (d) of section 380-c of the general business law, as added by chapter 867 of the laws of 1977, is amended to read as follows: (d) If a person applying for credit, insurance, or employment refuses to authorize the procurement or preparation of an investigative consumer report, the prospective creditor, insurer or employer may decline to grant credit, insurance or employment on the grounds that the applicant refused to execute such authorization; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT AN EMPLOYER SHALL NOT REFUSE TO HIRE A PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE ON THE GROUNDS THAT THE PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE REFUSES TO AUTHORIZE THE PROCUREMENT OF INFORMATION TO WHICH THE EMPLOYER IS NOT ENTITLED PURSUANT TO SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-U OF THIS ARTICLE. S 6. Section 380-i of the general business law is amended by adding a new subdivision (d) to read as follows: (D) IN USING A CONSUMER REPORT OR INVESTIGATIVE CONSUMER REPORT, WHERE THE REPORT CONTAINS INFORMATION BEARING ON THE CONSUMER'S CREDITWORTHI- NESS, CREDIT STANDING OR CREDIT CAPACITY, AN EMPLOYER, OR AGENT, REPRE- SENTATIVE OR DESIGNEE THEREOF BEFORE TAKING ANY ADVERSE ACTION BASED IN WHOLE OR PART ON THE REPORT, SHALL PROVIDE TO THE JOB APPLICANT OR EMPLOYEE: (1) THE NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER OF THE CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCY PROVIDING THE REPORT; (2) A DESCRIPTION OF THE CONSUMER'S RIGHTS UNDER SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-B OF THIS ARTICLE; AND (3) A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY TO RESPOND TO ANY INFORMATION IN THE REPORT THAT IS DISPUTED BY THE CONSUMER. S 7. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 219-d to read as follows: S 219-D. FILING OF COMPLAINT. ANY EMPLOYEE OR PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEE MAY FILE WITH THE COMMISSIONER A COMPLAINT REGARDING AN ALLEGED VIOLATION OF SECTION THREE HUNDRED EIGHTY-U OF THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW FOR AN INVESTIGATION OF SUCH COMPLAINT AND STATEMENT SETTING THE APPRO- PRIATE REMEDY, IF ANY. S 8. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus