Provides that spouses may be granted a judgment of divorce in a timely fashion provided they meet certain conditions.
Sponsor: HASSELL-THOMPSON
Law Section: Domestic Relations Law
Law: Amd S170, Dom Rel L
Co-sponsor(s):
ADAMS, BRESLIN, DILAN, ESPADA, HUNTLEY, KLEIN, KRUEGER, MONTGOMERY, OPPENHEIMER, PARKER, PERALTA, PERKINS, SAMPSON, SMITH, STAVISKY, THOMPSON
Law Section: Domestic Relations Law
Law: Amd S170, Dom Rel L
S3890A-2009 Actions
- Oct 8, 2010: APPROVAL MEMO.27
- Aug 13, 2010: SIGNED CHAP.384
- Aug 3, 2010: DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
- Jul 1, 2010: returned to senate
- Jul 1, 2010: passed assembly
- Jul 1, 2010: ordered to third reading rules cal.523
- Jul 1, 2010: substituted for a9753a
- Jun 15, 2010: referred to judiciary
- Jun 15, 2010: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 15, 2010: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 1, 2010: AMENDED ON THIRD READING 3890A
- May 25, 2010: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- May 24, 2010: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- May 18, 2010: 1ST REPORT CAL.570
- May 3, 2010: NOTICE OF COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION - REQUESTED
- Jan 6, 2010: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
- Jul 16, 2009: COMMITTED TO RULES
- May 26, 2009: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- May 20, 2009: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- May 19, 2009: 1ST REPORT CAL.358
- Apr 2, 2009: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
S3890A-2009 Calendars
Active List: Jun 15, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 2, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 3, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 7, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 8, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 9, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 10, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 14, 2010 , Floor Calendar: Jun 15, 2010S3890A-2009 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Judiciary
- May 18, 2010
Ayes (11): Sampson, Schneiderman, Hassell-Thompson, Klein, Adams, Espada, Breslin, Dilan, Savino, Perkins, Bonacic
Ayes W/R (3): Onorato, Lanza, Leibell
Nays (9): Diaz, Nozzolio, Maziarz, DeFrancisco, Volker, Saland, LaValle, Winner, Ranzenhofer
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 15, 2010
Ayes (32): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Aubertine, Bonacic, Breslin, Dilan, Duane, Espada, Foley, Hassell-Thomps, Huntley, Johnson C, Klein, Krueger, Kruger, Montgomery, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Sampson, Savino, Schneiderman, Serrano, Smith, Squadron, Stachowski, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins, Thompson, Valesky
Nays (29): DeFrancisco, Diaz, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Golden, Griffo, Hannon, Johnson O, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Leibell, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, Onorato, Padavan, Ranzenhofer, Robach, Saland, Seward, Skelos, Volker, Winner, Young
Excused (1): Morahan
S3890A-2009 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S3890A REVISED 7/27/10 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to no fault divorce PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF THE BILL: This bill would allow a judgment of divorce to be granted to either a husband or a wife without assigning fault to either of the parties. However, a divorce could only be granted after the major ancillary issues have been resolved. SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1. Section 170 of the Domestic Relations Law is amended by adding subdivision 7 allowing divorce when a marriage is irretrievably broken for a period of at least six months, provided that one party has so stated under oath. This judgment can only be granted after the following ancillary issues have been resolved: the equitable distribution of marital property, the payment or waiver of spousal support, the payment of child support, the payment of counsel and expert fees and expenses, and custody and visita- tion with the infant children of the marriage. A judgment of divorce under this subdivision could not be issued until all these issues are resolved. Section 2 establishes that this act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become law. JUSTIFICATION: New York is the only state that does not have a no-fault divorce provision. Currently, a divorce can only be procured by alleging fault such as cruel and inhuman treatment, adultery, abandonment or confinement of the defendant in prison (in addition to the parties living apart pursuant to a separation agreement or judicial decree for more than one year). Yet many people divorce for valid reasons that do not fall under these clas- sifications. They are forced to invent false justifications to legally dissolve their marriages. False accusations and the necessity to hold one partner at fault often result in conflict within the family. The conflict is harmful to the partners and destructive to the emotional well being of children. Prolonging the divorce process adds additional stress to an already difficult situation. A study cited at the 2007 Forum on the Need for No-Fault Divorce presented by the NYS Office of Court Administration's Office of Matrimo- nial and Family Law Study and Reform showed a large decline in domestic violence in states with no-fault divorce. The 37 states studied that have adopted no-fault divorce statutes have seen female suicide rates decline approximately 20% while reports of domestic violence committed by husbands against wives were reduced by more than one-third. This legislation enables parties to legally end a marriage which is, in reality, already over and cannot be salvaged. Its intent is to lessen the disputes that often arise between the parties and to mitigate the potential harm to them and their children caused by the current process. Because a resolution of all the major issues must be reached before a divorce judgment is granted, this legislation safeguards the parties' rights and economic interests. It is the intent of this legislation to grant full recognition and respect to valid marriages of same-sex couples to obtain relief under New York State laws and in New York's courts. While the Domestic Relations Law uses the terms "husband and wife" in some places and "plaintiff and defendant" in others, in using the terms "husband and wife", it is not the intent of this legislation to preclude access to relief under the Domestic Relations Law by same-sex couples with valid marriages performed outside the state. Current New York law, written to apply to "husband and wife," has been properly interpreted by New York courts to allow relief for same-sex couples with valid marriages. It is not the intent of this legislation to alter the interpretations of this case law including Martinez v. County of Monroe. 50 A.D.3d 189, 850 N.Y.S.2d 740 (4th Dept 2008), Beth R. v. Donna M., 19 Misc. 3d 724, (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 2008), and C.M. v. C.C., 867 N.Y.S.2d 884, (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County 2008), nor is it the intent of this legislation to alter New York State's policy to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: A.9398A of 2007-2008 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become law.
S3890A-2009 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
3890--A
Cal. No. 570
2009-2010 Regular Sessions
I N SENATE
April 2, 2009
___________
Introduced by Sens. HASSELL-THOMPSON, ADAMS, DILAN, ESPADA, KLEIN,
KRUEGER, MONTGOMERY, SAMPSON, THOMPSON -- read twice and ordered
printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judici-
ary -- recommitted to the Committee on Judiciary in accordance with
Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- reported favorably from said committee,
ordered to first and second report, ordered to a third reading,
amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of
third reading
AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to no fault
divorce
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 170 of the domestic relations law is amended by
adding a new subdivision 7 to read as follows:
(7) THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUSBAND AND WIFE HAS BROKEN DOWN IRRE-
TRIEVABLY FOR A PERIOD OF AT LEAST SIX MONTHS, PROVIDED THAT ONE PARTY
HAS SO STATED UNDER OATH. NO JUDGMENT OF DIVORCE SHALL BE GRANTED UNDER
THIS SUBDIVISION UNLESS AND UNTIL THE ECONOMIC ISSUES OF EQUITABLE
DISTRIBUTION OF MARITAL PROPERTY, THE PAYMENT OR WAIVER OF SPOUSAL
SUPPORT, THE PAYMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT, THE PAYMENT OF COUNSEL AND
EXPERTS' FEES AND EXPENSES AS WELL AS THE CUSTODY AND VISITATION WITH
THE INFANT CHILDREN OF THE MARRIAGE HAVE BEEN RESOLVED BY THE PARTIES,
OR DETERMINED BY THE COURT AND INCORPORATED INTO THE JUDGMENT OF
DIVORCE.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall
have become a law and and shall apply to matrimonial actions commenced
on or after such effective date.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03530-05-0

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus