Defines certain terms related to budget planners and regulates the activities of budget planners.
Sponsor: GRIFFO
Law Section: General Business Law
Law: Amd SS455 & 457, Gen Bus L; amd SS579, 584-a, 584-b & 585, Bank L
Co-sponsor(s):
ZELDIN
Committee: CODES
Law Section: General Business Law
Law: Amd SS455 & 457, Gen Bus L; amd SS579, 584-a, 584-b & 585, Bank L
S5215C-2011 Actions
- Jun 13, 2012: referred to codes
- Jun 13, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 13, 2012: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 13, 2012: ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1235
- Jun 13, 2012: COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
- Jun 1, 2012: PRINT NUMBER 5215C
- Jun 1, 2012: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO FINANCE
- Jan 18, 2012: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
- Jun 24, 2011: COMMITTED TO RULES
- Jun 14, 2011: AMENDED ON THIRD READING 5215B
- Jun 14, 2011: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Jun 13, 2011: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Jun 7, 2011: 1ST REPORT CAL.1060
- Jun 2, 2011: PRINT NUMBER 5215A
- Jun 2, 2011: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO BANKS
- May 17, 2011: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO BANKS
- May 3, 2011: REFERRED TO CONSUMER PROTECTION
S5215C-2011 Meetings
Rules: Jun 18, 2012S5215C-2011 Calendars
Floor Calendar: Jun 13, 2012S5215C-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Consumer Protection
- May 17, 2011
Ayes (10): Zeldin, Ball, Fuschillo, Little, Marcellino, O'Mara, Adams, Hassell-Thompson, Huntley, Squadron
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Banks
- Jun 7, 2011
Ayes (17): Griffo, Farley, Bonacic, DeFrancisco, Gallivan, Golden, Johnson, O'Mara, Marcellino, Ranzenhofer, Smith, Breslin, Carlucci, Diaz, Rivera, Savino, Valesky
Ayes W/R (1): Kruger
Nays (1): Krueger
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Consumer Protection
- Jan 18, 2012
Ayes (8): Zeldin, Ball, Fuschillo, Little, Marcellino, O'Mara, Hassell-Thompson, Squadron
Ayes W/R (2): Adams, Huntley
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Rules
- Jun 13, 2012
Ayes (21): Skelos, Alesi, Farley, Fuschillo, Johnson, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Marcellino, Nozzolio, Saland, Seward, Sampson, Breslin, Dilan, Duane, Hassell-Thompson, Montgomery, Parker, Smith, Stewart-Cousins
Ayes W/R (2): Hannon, Maziarz
Nays (1): Perkins
Excused (1): Krueger
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 13, 2012
Ayes (59): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Espaillat, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Storobin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Nays (1): Maziarz
Excused (2): Huntley, Krueger
S5215C-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S5215C TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general business law and the banking law, in relation to defining terms related to budget planning and regulating the activities of budget planners PURPOSE: The purpose of the bill is to provide clarity with regard to fees paid by debtors to budget planners; brings the New York budget planning statute in line with the majority of other state with respect to non-profit and for-profit providers; and gives the attorney general enforcement powers with respect to violations of the statute. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section one of the bill amends the general business law to make a clarification with regard to payments made by debtors and repeals the statutory language that allows only not-for-profit corporations to provide budget planning services. Section two of the bill amends the general business law to make violations of the article punishable by a class A misdemeanor as provided in the penal law and gives the attorney general the authority to make an application to a court or justice to issue an injunction to enjoin and restrain any violations of the article. The section also allows the court or justice to impose a civil penalty of not more than $500 per contract for a violation of the section. Section three of the bill amends the banking law to repeal the statutory language that allows only not-for-profit corporations to provide budget planning services. Section four and five of the bill amend the banking law to require that fees or charges imposed must be fair, reasonable and easily understood by the consumer and that no budget planner shall charge any consumer for any other service not directly related to budget planning unless pre-approved by the superintendent. Section six of the bill clarifies the superintendent's role when determining fees or charges so to ensure they are not unfair or unclear. Section seven of the bill provides for an effective date. JUSTIFICATION: Budget planning offers programs and services to help consumers regain their financial footing. Across the country budget planners consist of nonprofit and for-profit providers that offer financial counseling, education, budgeting and debt management products designed to assist consumer in repaying unsecured debt through methods other than bankruptcy. Each year this industry serves an estimated ten million consumers and moves approximately $20 billion between debtors and their creditors on structured repayment plans. The industry is regulated primarily on the state level. Forty nine states and the District of Columbia have laws that range from a full licensing and regulatory structure, such as New York, to misdemeanor penalties for violating statutory requirements. Most states have updated their laws in the past five years to reflect the changing industry and the Federal Trade Commission has utilized its authority to police unfair and deceptive trade practices by unscrupulous providers. New York's budget planning statute was enacted nearly sixty years ago. The current law provides for significant consumer protections and establishes a high bar for licensure. The law however does not reflect recent changes in the industry. For instance, the law does not allow licensure of taxable entities that provide budget planning services. A common misconception about budget planners is that only nonprofit entities can provide appropriate budget planning services. Forty states make no distinction between providers based on their tax status. Instead, they regulate and oversee the products and services of all providers. Regulating based on the products and services, rather than the service provider, is consistent with other financial services regulation. This legislation moves New York toward a more modern approach to regulating budget planners by regulating based on the services they provide and not based on the tax status of the provider. The bill also provides clarity in the statute by requiring regulators to ensure that fees are fair, reasonable and clearly understood. The bill also enhances the oversight of the budget planning industry by giving the attorney general greater authority to police bad actors as well as imposes enhanced penalties to deter bad behavior. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: This is a new bill. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Additional revenue to the Department of Financial Services from licensing fees. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect in 180 days from enactment.
S5215C-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
5215--C
2011-2012 Regular Sessions
I N SENATE
May 3, 2011
___________
Introduced by Sens. GRIFFO, ZELDIN -- read twice and ordered printed,
and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer
Protection -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to
the Committee on Banks -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered
reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported
favorably from said committee, ordered to first and second report,
ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining
its place in the order of third reading -- recommitted to the Commit-
tee on Consumer Protection in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 --
reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee
on Finance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as
amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the general business law and the banking law, in
relation to defining terms related to budget planning and regulating
the activities of budget planners
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Section 455 of the general business law, as amended by
chapter 629 of the laws of 2002, subdivisions 1 and 4 as amended by
chapter 456 of the laws of 2006, is amended to read as follows:
S 455. Definitions. 1. Budget planning, as used in this article, means
the making of a contract between a person or entity engaged in the busi-
ness of budget planning with a particular debtor whereby:
(i) the debtor agrees to pay a sum or sums of money in any manner or
form and the person or entity engaged in the business of budget planning
distributes, or supervises, coordinates or controls the distribution of,
or has a contractual relationship with another person or entity that
distributes, or supervises, coordinates or controls such distribution
of, the same among certain specified creditors in accordance with a
PERIODIC PAYMENT plan agreed upon BY THE DEBTOR'S CREDITORS AT OR NEAR
THE TIME THE CONTRACT IS ENTERED; and
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD11381-06-2
S. 5215--C 2
(ii) the debtor agrees to pay to such person or entity, or such other
person or entity that distributes, or supervises, coordinates or
controls such distribution of, a sum or sums of money, any valuable
consideration for such services or for any other services rendered in
connection therewith. For the purposes of this article, a person or
entity shall be considered as engaged in the business of budget planning
in New York, and subject to this article and the licensing and other
requirements of article twelve-C of the banking law, if such person or
entity solicits budget planning business within this state and, in
connection with such solicitation, enters into a contract for budget
planning with an individual then resident in this state.
2. Person, as used in this article, shall not include a person admit-
ted to practice law in this state.
3. Entity, as used in this article, shall not include a firm, partner-
ship, professional corporation, or other organization, all of the
members or principals of which are admitted to practice law in this
state.
4. [Person or entity as used in this article shall not include a type
B not-for-profit corporation as defined in section two hundred one of
the not-for-profit corporation law of this state, or an entity incorpo-
rated in another state and having a similar not-for-profit status,
licensed by the superintendent, to engage in the business of budget
planning as defined in this section.
5.] Any attorney licensed to practice law in this state who is engaged
in budget planning shall:
(a) negotiate directly with creditors on behalf of the client;
(b) ensure that all moneys received from the client are deposited in
the attorney's account maintained for client funds;
(c) pay creditors from such account; and
(d) offer budget planning services through the same legal entity that
the attorney uses to practice law.
S 2. Section 457 of the general business law, as amended by chapter
629 of the laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows:
S 457. [Penalty] PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE; CRIMINAL AND
CIVIL. (A) Whoever either individually or as officer, director or
employee of any person, firm, association or corporation, violates any
of the provisions of the preceding section shall be guilty of a CLASS A
misdemeanor [for each such violation] PUNISHABLE AS PROVIDED IN ARTICLES
SEVENTY AND EIGHTY OF THE PENAL LAW.
(B) WHENEVER THERE SHALL BE A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE, APPLICATION
MAY BE MADE BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE OF THE
STATE OF NEW YORK TO A COURT OR JUSTICE HAVING JURISDICTION BY A SPECIAL
PROCEEDING TO ISSUE AN INJUNCTION, AND UPON NOTICE TO THE DEFENDANT OF
NOT LESS THAN FIVE DAYS, TO ENJOIN AND RESTRAIN THE CONTINUANCE OF SUCH
VIOLATIONS; AND IF IT SHALL APPEAR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COURT OR
JUSTICE THAT THE DEFENDANT HAS, IN FACT, VIOLATED THIS ARTICLE, AN
INJUNCTION MAY BE ISSUED BY SUCH COURT OR JUSTICE, ENJOINING AND
RESTRAINING ANY FURTHER VIOLATION, WITHOUT REQUIRING PROOF THAT ANY
PERSON HAS, IN FACT, BEEN INJURED OR DAMAGED THEREBY. IN CONNECTION WITH
ANY SUCH PROPOSED APPLICATION, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IS AUTHORIZED TO
TAKE PROOF AND MAKE A DETERMINATION OF THE RELEVANT FACTS AND TO ISSUE
SUBPOENAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES. WHENEVER
THE COURT SHALL DETERMINE THAT A VIOLATION OF SECTION FOUR HUNDRED
FIFTY-SIX OF THIS ARTICLE HAS OCCURRED, THE COURT MAY IMPOSE A CIVIL
PENALTY OF NOT MORE THAN FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS PER CONTRACT MADE IN
VIOLATION OF SUCH SECTION, NOT TO EXCEED ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS.
S. 5215--C 3
S 3. Section 579 of the banking law, as amended by chapter 629 of the
laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows:
S 579. Doing business without license prohibited. [Only a type B not-
for-profit corporation as defined in section two hundred one of the
not-for-profit corporation law of this state, or an entity incorporated
in another state and having a similar not-for-profit status,] NO PERSON
OR ENTITY shall engage in the business of budget planning as defined in
subdivision one of section four hundred fifty-five of the general busi-
ness law [of this state] except as authorized by this article and with-
out first obtaining a license from the superintendent.
S 4. Subdivision 2 of section 584-a of the banking law, as added by
chapter 629 of the laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows:
2. the total fees agreed to for such services, including any adjust-
ments for estimated available rebates from creditors, provided that
nothing in this subdivision shall require a licensee to share rebates
with its clients AND PROVIDED THAT ANY FEES OR CHARGES IMPOSED MUST BE
FAIR, REASONABLE AND EASILY UNDERSTOOD;
S 5. Section 584-b of the banking law is amended by adding two new
subdivisions 4-a and 14 to read as follows:
4-A. NO LICENSEE SHALL IMPOSE ANY FEE OR CHARGE WHATSOEVER THAT IS
NOT FAIR, REASONABLE AND ABLE TO BE EASILY UNDERSTOOD.
14. NO LICENSEE SHALL CHARGE THE DEBTOR FOR OR PROVIDE CREDIT OR OTHER
INSURANCE, COUPONS FOR GOODS OR SERVICES, MEMBERSHIP IN A CLUB, ACCESS
TO COMPUTERS OR THE INTERNET, OR ANY OTHER MATTER NOT DIRECTLY RELATED
TO BUDGET PLANNING SERVICES UNLESS PRE-APPROVED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT.
S 6. Section 585 of the banking law, as amended by chapter 629 of the
laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows:
S 585. Superintendent authorized to examine. For the purpose of
discovering violations of this article or securing information lawfully
required by him or her hereunder, the superintendent may at any time,
and as often as he or she may determine, either personally or by a
person duly designated by him or her, investigate the business and exam-
ine the books, accounts, records, and files used therein of every licen-
see hereunder. For that purpose the superintendent and his or her duly
designated representative shall have free access to the offices and
place of business, books, accounts, papers, records, files, safes and
vaults of all such licensees. The superintendent and any person duly
designated by him or her shall have authority to require the attendance
of and to examine under oath all persons whose testimony he or she may
require relative to such business. The expenses incurred in making any
examination pursuant to this section shall be assessed against and paid
by the licensee so examined, except that traveling and subsistence
expenses so incurred shall be charged against and paid by licensees in
such proportions as the superintendent shall deem just and reasonable,
and such proportionate charges shall be added to the assessment of the
other expenses incurred upon each examination. Upon written notice by
the superintendent of the total amount of such assessment, the licensee
shall become liable for and shall pay such assessment to the superinten-
dent. If, upon review, the superintendent shall determine that the fees
or service charges set by the licensee are UNFAIR, unreasonable OR
UNCLEAR, he or she shall direct the licensee to make adjustments in said
fees and service charges in accordance with his or her findings, which
shall set forth a detailed factual basis and reasoning supporting such
finding.
S 7. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after
it shall have become a law and shall apply to all debt settlement
S. 5215--C 4
services agreements entered into or offered on or after such date;
provided, however, that effective immediately, the superintendent of
financial services shall add, amend, and/or repeal any rule or regu-
lation he or she deems necessary or desirable for implementation of this
act.

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus