This bill has been amended

Bill S5376-2013

Provides incentives for productive workers' compensation audits

Provides incentives for productive workers' compensation audits.

Details

Actions

  • May 16, 2013: REFERRED TO LABOR

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S5376

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the workers' compensation law, in relation to providing incentives for productive workers' compensation audits

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

To prevent workers' compensation insurance fraud by ensuring that all employers in the State are appropriately classified.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:

Section 1 of the bill would add a new Section 112-A to the Workers' Compensation Law.

Paragraph (a) of subdivision one of such Section would require periodic audits, including but not limited to, payroll records verifications and onsite physical inspections, in order to determine each employer's unique experience-rated operations for premium calculations. Construction class employers shall be audited annually and all other employers not less than biennially.

Paragraph (b) of subdivision one such Section would make a knowing misrepresentation or concealment, of material information in order to avoid proper classification for purposes of premium calculations, a fraudulent insurance practice in violation of applicable provisions of Workers' Compensation Law Section 114 and Penal Law Section 176.05.

Subdivision two of such Section would exempt self-insureds from the provisions of the Section.

Subdivision three of such Section defines "construction class."

Section 2 of the bill sets forth the effective date.

JUSTIFICATION:

In order to combat Workers' Compensation Insurance fraud and hold down premiums charged, especially in the construction industry, periodic audits are necessary. Productive employer audits are beneficial, since they (1) protect workers by ensuring adequate workers' compensation coverage; (2) true-up premium, often leading to return of premium or credits against future installments; and (3) provide adequate premium for the appropriate risk classification. For instance, a roofing contractor claiming to be a kitchen remodeler leads to data corruption at the New York Compensation Insurance Rating Board and ultimately in the rate-making at the Division of Insurance of the Department of Financial Services.

Often, employers who refuse an audit are attempting to avoid paying the appropriate Workers' Compensation premium. Experience in states that have a periodic audit statute in place (like Florida, California, North Carolina and South Carolina) shows that appropriate Premium from an employer who refuses an audit may be in excess of established penalty provisions fox such refusals. This bill would make clear the penalties for refusing to submit to the standard practice of audits of

workers' compensation insurance policies, and would restate that refusal to permit an audit of payroll records and knowing misrepresentation or concealment of the number and type of employees and actual work performed could constitute criminal insurance fraud.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

New bill.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

This act shall take effect immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 5376 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE May 16, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sen. SEWARD -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor AN ACT to amend the workers' compensation law, in relation to providing incentives for productive workers' compensation audits THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The workers' compensation law is amended by adding a new section 112-a to read as follows: S 112-A. AUDITS OF EMPLOYERS. 1. (A) EMPLOYERS IN ALL CLASSES OTHER THAN THE CONSTRUCTION CLASS SHALL BE AUDITED NOT LESS FREQUENTLY THAN BIENNIALLY AND THE CHAIR OR BOARD MAY PROVIDE FOR MORE FREQUENT AUDITS OF EMPLOYERS IN SPECIFIED CLASSIFICATIONS BASED ON FACTORS SUCH AS AMOUNT OF PREMIUM, TYPE OF BUSINESS, LOSS RATIOS, OR OTHER RELEVANT FACTORS. IN NO EVENT SHALL EMPLOYERS IN THE CONSTRUCTION CLASS, GENERAT- ING MORE THAN THE AMOUNT OF PREMIUM REQUIRED TO BE EXPERIENCE RATED, BE AUDITED LESS FREQUENTLY THAN ANNUALLY. THE ANNUAL AUDITS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION CLASSES MAY CONSIST OF PHYSICAL ONSITE AUDITS. AT THE COMPLETION OF AN AUDIT, IF REQUESTED BY THE AUDITOR, THE EMPLOYER OR OFFICER OF THE CORPORATION AND THE AUDITOR MUST PRINT AND SIGN THEIR NAMES ON THE AUDIT DOCUMENT AFFIRMING THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED THEREIN. AS REQUIRED BY SECTION ONE HUNDRED TWELVE OF THIS ARTICLE, EMPLOYERS SHALL MAKE AVAILABLE ALL BOOKS AND RECORDS NECESSARY FOR THE PAYROLL VERIFICATION AUDIT AND PERMIT THE AUDITOR TO MAKE A PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE EMPLOYER'S OPERATION. IF AN EMPLOYER FAILS TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCESS TO ALL SUCH BOOKS AND RECORDS NECESSARY FOR A PAYROLL VERIFICATION AUDIT, INCLUDING A PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF THE EMPLOYER'S OPERATION, THE EMPLOYER SHALL PAY AN ADDITIONAL PREMIUM TO THE CARRIER OF THREE TIMES THE MOST RECENT ESTIMATED ANNUAL PREMIUM. (B) IF AN EMPLOYER KNOWINGLY UNDERSTATES OR KNOWINGLY CONCEALS PAYROLL, KNOWINGLY MISREPRESENTS OR KNOWINGLY CONCEALS EMPLOYEE DUTIES SO AS TO AVOID PROPER CLASSIFICATION FOR PREMIUM CALCULATIONS, OR KNOW-
INGLY MISREPRESENTS OR KNOWINGLY CONCEALS INFORMATION PERTINENT TO THE COMPUTATION AND APPLICATION OF AN EXPERIENCE RATING MODIFICATION FACTOR, SAID KNOWING MISREPRESENTATIONS OR KNOWING CONCEALMENTS SHALL BE CONSID- ERED FRAUDULENT PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ONE HUNDRED FOURTEEN OF THIS ARTICLE AND INSURANCE FRAUD IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 176.05 OF THE PENAL LAW. 2. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY TO EMPLOYERS THAT SELF-INSURE OR EMPLOYERS THAT ARE MEMBERS OF A WORKERS' COMPENSATION GROUP SELF-INSURED TRUST. 3. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "CONSTRUCTION CLASS" MEANS THE WORK OR OCCUPATION DESCRIBED IN "GROUP 3" OF SECTION THREE OF THIS CHAP- TER. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus