Authorizes municipalities and districts thereof to contract for goods and services jointly with the state or other municipalities.
Sponsor: LITTLE / Co-sponsor(s): CARLUCCI, MARTINS, OPPENHEIMER, RITCHIE, VALESKY / Committee: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Law Section: General Municipal Law / Law: Amd S103, Gen Muni L
Sponsor: LITTLE / Co-sponsor(s): CARLUCCI, MARTINS, OPPENHEIMER, RITCHIE, VALESKY / Committee: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Law Section: General Municipal Law / Law: Amd S103, Gen Muni L
S5525B-2011 Actions
- Aug 1, 2012: SIGNED CHAP.308
- Jul 20, 2012: DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR
- Jun 21, 2012: returned to senate
- Jun 21, 2012: passed assembly
- Jun 21, 2012: ordered to third reading rules cal.575
- Jun 21, 2012: substituted for a8034c
- Jun 21, 2012: referred to ways and means
- Jun 21, 2012: RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 21, 2012: REPASSED SENATE
- Jun 18, 2012: AMENDED ON THIRD READING 5525D
- Jun 18, 2012: AMENDED ON THIRD READING 5525C
- Jun 18, 2012: VOTE RECONSIDERED - RESTORED TO THIRD READING
- Jun 15, 2012: returned to senate
- Jun 15, 2012: RECALLED FROM ASSEMBLY
- Jan 31, 2012: referred to local governments
- Jan 31, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jan 31, 2012: PASSED SENATE
- Jan 30, 2012: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Jan 24, 2012: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Jan 23, 2012: 1ST REPORT CAL.91
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- Jan 4, 2012: returned to senate
- Jan 4, 2012: died in assembly
- Jun 20, 2011: referred to local governments
- Jun 20, 2011: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 20, 2011: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 20, 2011: ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1393
- Jun 20, 2011: COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
- Jun 16, 2011: PRINT NUMBER 5525B
- Jun 16, 2011: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- Jun 14, 2011: PRINT NUMBER 5525A
- Jun 14, 2011: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT
- May 31, 2011: REFERRED TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT
S5525B-2011 Meetings
Local Government: Jan 23, 2012, Rules: Jun 24, 2011S5525B-2011 Calendars
Active List: Jan 31, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jan 24, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jan 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jan 31, 2012S5525B-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Rules
- Jun 20, 2011
Ayes (24): Skelos, Alesi, Farley, Hannon, Johnson, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Marcellino, Maziarz, Nozzolio, Saland, Seward, Sampson, Breslin, Dilan, Duane, Hassell-Thompson, Krueger, Montgomery, Parker, Perkins, Smith, Stewart-Cousins
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 20, 2011
Ayes (62): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Espaillat, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Huntley, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Kruger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Local Government
- Jan 23, 2012
Ayes (8): Martins, Ball, Little, McDonald, Ritchie, Stewart-Cousins, Oppenheimer, Klein
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jan 31, 2012
Ayes (60): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Espaillat, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (1): Huntley
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 21, 2012
Ayes (60): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Perkins, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Storobin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (2): Espaillat, Huntley
S5525B-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S5525B TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the general municipal law, in relation to providing local governments greater contract flexibility and cost savings by permitting certain shared purchasing among political subdivisions; and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon the expiration thereof PURPOSE OF BILL: Authorizes municipalities and districts thereof to contract for goods and services jointly with federal and any state or other municipalities. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 amends section 103 of the general municipal law is amended by adding a new subdivision 16 to authorize any officer, board or agency of a county, political subdivision or any district therein authorized to make purchases of apparatus, materials, equipment or supplies, or to contract for services, may make such purchases, or may contract for such services, as may be required by such county, political subdivision or district there on through the use of a contract let by the United States of America or any agency thereof any state or any other county or political subdivision if such contract was let in a manner that constitutes competitive bidding consistent with state law and made available for use by other government entities. Section 2 contains the effective date and provision for repeal five years after such date. JUSTIFICATION: Cooperative purchasing, also commonly referred to as piggy-backing, is a procurement method whereby if a government agency has already gone through the procurement process and awarded a contract to one or more venders for a particular product or service, the contract can be utilized by other government agencies on the same terms and conditions. Piggy-backing has been proven to reduce administrative and product cost, increased efficiencies and stretch shrinking budgets during difficult times. Forty-eight states have either explicitly authorized cooperative purchasing or they have enacted a general joint powers statute or intergovernmental cooperation law that permits local public agencies to purchase from cooperative contracts that were solicited by another public agency. New York does not have statutory language in place that authorizes cooperative purchasing between New York's local governments and the federal, state or local governments elsewhere in the United States. This bill would amend the General Municipal law to allow for such cooperative purchasing. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New Bill. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to the State. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately, and shall expire and be deemed repealed five years after such date.
S5525B-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
5525--B
2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE May 31, 2011
Introduced by Sen. LITTLE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Local Government - committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the general municipal law, in relation to providing local governments greater contract flexibility and cost savings by permitting certain shared purchasing among political subdivisions; and providing for the repeal of such provisions upon the expiration there of
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Section 103 of the general municipal law is amended by adding a new subdivision 16 to read as follows:
16. NOTWITHSTANDING THE PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVISIONS ONE, TWO AND THREE OF THIS SECTION, AND SECTION ONE HUNDRED FOUR OF THIS ARTICLE, ANY OFFI CER, BOARD OR AGENCY OF A COUNTY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR OF ANY DISTRICT THEREIN AUTHORIZED TO MAKE PURCHASES OF APPARATUS, MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT OR SUPPLIES, OR TO CONTRACT FOR SERVICES, MAY MAKE SUCH PURCHASES, OR MAY CONTRACT FOR SUCH SERVICES, AS MAY BE REQUIRED BY SUCH COUNTY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR DISTRICT THEREIN THROUGH THE USE OF A CONTRACT LET BY THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OR ANY AGENCY THEREOF, ANY STATE OR ANY OTHER COUNTY OR POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR DISTRICT THEREIN IF SUCH CONTRACT WAS LET IN A MANNER THAT CONSTITUTES COMPETITIVE BIDDING CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW AND MADE AVAILABLE FOR USE BY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES. THE AUTHORITY PROVIDED TO COUNTIES, POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS AND DISTRICTS THEREIN PURSUANT TO THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL NOT RELIEVE ANY OBLIGATION OF SUCH COUNTY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OR DISTRICT THEREIN TO COMPLY WITH ANY APPLICABLE MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD11416-06-1
S. 5525--B 2 PROGRAM MANDATES AND THE PREFERRED SOURCE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-TWO OF THE STATE FINANCE LAW.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall expire and be deemed repealed five years after such date.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus