Permits a plaintiff to recover directly against a third party defendant found to be liable to the defendant in certain actions.
Sponsor: DEFRANCISCO / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Civil Practice Law and Rules / Law: Add S1405, CPLR
Sponsor: DEFRANCISCO / Committee: JUDICIARY
Law Section: Civil Practice Law and Rules / Law: Add S1405, CPLR
S555-2013 Actions
- Jan 9, 2013: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
S555-2013 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S555 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to permitting a plaintiff to recover against a third party defendant in certain cases PURPOSE: This bill would add a new Section 1405 to the Civil Practice Law and Rules (CPLR) to expressly permit a plaintiff, as judgment creditor against defendant, to recover and collect an unsatisfied judgment or portion of a judgment directly against a third-party defendant found liable for contribution or indemnification. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1: Adds anew Section 1405 to the CPLR to permit a plaintiff to recover and collect an unsatisfied judgment or a portion of a judgment against a third-party defendant or co-defendant, when a plaintiff has entered judgment against a defendant which is unsatisfied thirty days after service on the defendant-judgment debtor, and where judgment has been entered in favor of the defendant-judgment debtor against a co-defendant or third-party defendant on a cause of action for contribution or indemnification. Under certain circumstances where the plaintiff's judgment remains unsatisfied thirty days after it has been served on the defendant-judgment debtor, and where the defendant-judgment debtor has a cause of action for contribution or indemnification which has not been reduced to judgment, then the plaintiff-judgment creditor may attach, or take an assignment from the defendant-judgment debtor of the cause of action for contribution or indemnification and prosecute the action in the plaintiff's own name or in the name of the defendant-judgment debtor. Direct recovery, however, is not authorized against a third-party defendant in those circumstances in which the third-party claim would have been barred by Section 11 of the Workers Compensation Law. Section 2: The effective date for this Act is immediately, and shall apply to all judgments entered by plaintiffs on or after such date. EXISTING LAW: Section 1401 of the CPLR provides, with certain exceptions under the General Obligations Law and the Workers' Compensation Law, that two or more persons who are subject to liability for damages for the same personal injury, injury to property or wrongful death, may claim contribution among them whether or not an action has been brought or a judgment has been rendered against the person from whom contribution is sought. Section 1403 of the CPLR provides that a cause of action for contribution may be asserted in a separate action or by cross-claim, counter-claim or third-party claim in a pending action. JUSTIFICATION: A plaintiffs recovery on a judgment that ultimately comes from a third-party defendant should not depend on the fortuity of the solvency of the defendant/third party plaintiff. Accordingly, this measure would allow a plaintiff to recover on a judgment for contribution or indemnification directly against the third-party defendant, whether or not the defendant/third-party plaintiff has satisfied the underlying judgment for which contribution or indemnification is sought. Thus, in the case where a defendant/third-party plaintiff is insolvent and is unable to pay the judgment to the plaintiff: the plaintiff could still seek to recover directly that portion of the judgment, as determined by the principles of contribution and indemnification, owed by the third-party defendant to the defendant/third-party plaintiff. This measure would not alter in any way the substantive law of Workers' Compensation. The 1996 Omnibus Worker's Compensation Reform Act already limits claims for contribution and indemnification against an employer to only those cases involving "grave injuries." In cases where there are not grave injuries the employer is not liable as a matter of substantive law, and therefore this measure would not affect such employers at all. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2011-2012 S.3761/A.630; 2009-2010 S.2392/A.2576; 2007-2008 S.2065/A.6310; 2005-2006 S.7487/A.11076; 2003-04 S.5006/A.7493 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Act will take effect immediately and shall apply to all judgments entered by plaintiffs on or after such date.
S555-2013 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
555 2013-2014 Regular Sessions I N SENATE (PREFILED)
January 9, 2013
Introduced by Sen. DeFRANCISCO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to permit ting a plaintiff to recover against a third party defendant in certain cases
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new section 1405 to read as follows:
S 1405. PERMITTING PLAINTIFF, AS JUDGMENT CREDITOR AGAINST DEFENDANT, TO RECOVER AND COLLECT UNSATISFIED JUDGMENT OR PORTION OF JUDGMENT AGAINST THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT OR CO-DEFENDANT LIABLE FOR CONTRIBUTION OR INDEMNIFICATION. (A) WHERE A PLAINTIFF HAS ENTERED A JUDGMENT AGAINST A DEFENDANT AND THE JUDGMENT REMAINS UNSATISFIED THIRTY DAYS AFTER IT HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR, AND WHERE JUDGMENT HAS BEEN ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR AGAINST A CO-DE FENDANT OR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT ON A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CONTRIBUTION OR FOR CONTRACTUAL OR COMMON LAW INDEMNIFICATION, THE PLAINTIFF-JUDGMENT CREDITOR MAY COLLECT ANY UNSATISFIED AMOUNT OF THE PLAINTIFF'S JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANT FROM THE CO-DEFENDANT OR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT UP TO THE AMOUNT AWARDED ON THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CONTRIBUTION OR INDEM NIFICATION. (B) WHERE THE PLAINTIFF'S JUDGMENT REMAINS UNSATISFIED THIRTY DAYS AFTER IT HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR, AND WHERE THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR HAS A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CONTRIBUTION OR FOR CONTRACTUAL OR COMMON LAW INDEMNIFICATION WHICH HAS NOT BEEN REDUCED TO JUDGMENT, THE PLAINTIFF-JUDGMENT CREDITOR MAY ATTACH, OR TAKE AN ASSIGN MENT FROM THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR OF, THE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR CONTRIBUTION OR INDEMNIFICATION, AND PROSECUTE THE CAUSE OF ACTION IN THE PLAINTIFF'S OWN NAME OR IN THE NAME OF THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03702-01-3
S. 555 2 DEBTOR, AND RECOVER A JUDGMENT THEREIN FOR THE SAME AMOUNT OF CONTRIB UTION OR INDEMNIFICATION AS WOULD BE AWARDED TO THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR IF THE DEFENDANT-JUDGMENT DEBTOR HAD SATISFIED PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL JUDGMENT IN FULL. SUCH REMEDY IS IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER MEANS AVAILABLE TO THE PLAINTIFF-JUDGMENT DEBTOR FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE JUDG MENT. THIS SECTION SHALL NOT AUTHORIZE DIRECT RECOVERY AGAINST A THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH THE THIRD-PARTY CLAIM AGAINST THAT THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT WOULD HAVE BEEN BARRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION ELEVEN OF THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately, and shall apply to all judgments entered by plaintiffs on or after such date.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus