Requires DNA testing of all persons convicted of misdemeanors and felonies.
Sponsor: SALAND
Law Section: Executive Law / Law: Amd SS995& 995-c, Exec L
Sponsor: SALAND
Law Section: Executive Law / Law: Amd SS995& 995-c, Exec L
S5560A-2011 Actions
- Jan 31, 2012: referred to codes
- Jan 31, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jan 31, 2012: PASSED SENATE
- Jan 30, 2012: ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.128
- Jan 30, 2012: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
- Jan 26, 2012: PRINT NUMBER 5560A
- Jan 26, 2012: AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO FINANCE
- Jan 18, 2012: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO CODES
- Jan 4, 2012: returned to senate
- Jan 4, 2012: died in assembly
- Jun 16, 2011: referred to codes
- Jun 16, 2011: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 16, 2011: PASSED SENATE
- Jun 14, 2011: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Jun 13, 2011: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Jun 7, 2011: 1ST REPORT CAL.1111
- Jun 7, 2011: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
- Jun 1, 2011: REFERRED TO CODES
S5560A-2011 Meetings
Finance: Jan 30, 2012, Rules: Jan 30, 2012S5560A-2011 Calendars
Active List: Jan 31, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jan 31, 2012S5560A-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Rules
- Jan 30, 2012
Ayes (16): Skelos, Alesi, Farley, Fuschillo, Hannon, Johnson, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Marcellino, Maziarz, Nozzolio, Saland, Seward, Smith, Stewart-Cousins
Ayes W/R (3): Sampson, Duane, Hassell-Thompson
Nays (6): Breslin, Dilan, Krueger, Montgomery, Parker, Perkins
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Finance
- Jan 30, 2012
Ayes (25): DeFrancisco, Johnson, Alesi, Bonacic, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Golden, Griffo, Hannon, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Little, Marcellino, Nozzolio, Robach, Saland, Seward, Young, Diaz, Gianaris, Peralta, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins
Ayes W/R (3): Duane, Oppenheimer, Squadron
Nays (7): Krueger, Breslin, Dilan, Montgomery, Parker, Perkins, Rivera
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jan 31, 2012
Ayes (49): Adams, Addabbo, Alesi, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Oppenheimer, Peralta, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousins, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Nays (10): Breslin, Dilan, Duane, Hassell-Thompson, Krueger, Montgomery, Parker, Perkins, Rivera, Serrano
Absent (1): Espaillat
Excused (1): Huntley
S5560A-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S5560A TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the executive law, in relation to DNA testing of certain offenders convicted of a crime PURPOSE: To require that every person convicted of a felony as defined in any chapter of the laws of the state or a misdemeanor as defined in the Penal Law must provide a DNA sample. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill would amend Executive Law § 995(7) to require that every individual convicted of a felony as defined in any chapter of the laws of the state or a misdemeanor as defined in the Penal Law must provide a DNA sample. Section 2 of the bill would amend Executive Law § 995-C to designate who shall collect the sample with respect to those designated offenders sentenced to terms of imprisonment, terms of probation, or a designated offender whose sentence does not include either a term of imprisonment or a term of probation. Section 3 of the bill - effective date. JUSTIFICATION: In 2010, Curtis Tucker was arrested and arraigned on the 2004 attempted murder and attempted rape of a 14-year-old girl in her Harlem apartment building. Tucker choked his young victim to unconsciousness several times and violently seized her money and student Metrocard. The victim fought back, falling with her assailant down three flights of stairs. At the bottom of the stairs, he attempted to rape her. Finally, he ran away, leaving her with permanent injuries to her face. Tucker subsequently was convicted of two misdemeanor crimes, and, more recently of felony burglary against a 74-year-old man who was afflicted with Parkinson's disease. Until the burglary conviction, none of Tucker's prior criminal convictions were eligible for DNA collection upon conviction. If DNA was required upon conviction for all crimes, law enforcement would have solved the 2004 rape much earlier and potentially prevented the 2010 burglary of an elderly man. In 2006, New York recognized the importance of DNA as a crime fighting tool by adding all remaining felonies, some attempted felonies and 18 misdemeanors to the list of qualifying offenses for the DNA Index. The result: hits resulting from samples taken on those expanded offenses led to 1,595 convictions in the three years immediately following the expansion. This dramatic success illustrate the value of taking DNA from people associated with low-level and non-violent offenses; of the new qualifying offenses, very few were violent or sexual in nature; they included such crimes as bribery of a public servant, possession of a forged instrument, and falsification of business records. Yet, despite the fact that DNA is a proven tool that solves cold cases and can prevent crime, only 46% of Penal Law crimes are eligible for DNA collection. The language in this bill mirrors the 2012-2013 FY Executive Budget proposal by Governor Andrew Cuomo which set forth an all-crimes DNA databank. The all-crimes databank would be the first of its kind in the nation and would include all felonies and Penal Law misdemeanors. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2011 - S.5560 passed Senate FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Governor Cuomo's Executive Budget, estimates that the enactment of this bill is expected to cost approximately $700,000 in 2012-13, with a full annual cost of $1.4 million. This amount includes the cost of additional personnel in the Division of Criminal Justice Services and of DNA test kits and State Police forensic laboratory consumables. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect October 1, 2012.
S5560A-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
5560--A
2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE June 1, 2011
Introduced by Sens. SALAND, SKELOS, BALL, GOLDEN, KLEIN, O'MARA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes -- recommitted to the Committee on Codes in accord ance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to DNA testing of certain offenders convicted of a crime
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 7 of section 995 of the executive law, as amended by chapter 2 of the laws of 2006, paragraph (a) as separately amended by chapter 320 of the laws of 2006 and paragraph (f) as amended by chapter 405 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
7. "Designated offender" means a person convicted of [and sentencedfor any one or more of the following provisions of the penal law (a)sections 120.05, 120.10, and 120.11, relating to assault; sections125.15 through 125.27 relating to homicide; sections 130.25, 130.30,130.35, 130.40, 130.45, 130.50, 130.65, 130.67 and 130.70, relating tosex offenses; sections 205.10, 205.15, 205.17 and 205.19, relating toescape and other offenses, where the offender has been convicted withinthe previous five years of one of the other felonies specified in thissubdivision; or sections 255.25, 255.26 and 255.27, relating to incest,a violent felony offense as defined in subdivision one of section 70.02of the penal law, attempted murder in the first degree, as defined insection 110.00 and section 125.27 of the penal law, kidnapping in thefirst degree, as defined in section 135.25 of the penal law, arson inthe first degree, as defined in section 150.20 of the penal law,burglary in the third degree, as defined in section 140.20 of the penallaw, attempted burglary in the third degree, as defined in sectionEXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD11912-02-2
S. 5560--A 2110.00 and section 140.20 of the penal law, a felony defined in articlefour hundred ninety of the penal law relating to terrorism or anyattempt to commit an offense defined in such article relating to terror-ism which is a felony; or (b) criminal possession of a controlledsubstance in the first degree, as defined in section 220.21 of the penallaw; criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree,as defined in section 220.18 of the penal law; criminal sale of acontrolled substance, as defined in article 220 of the penal law; orgrand larceny in the fourth degree, as defined in subdivision five ofsection 155.30 of the penal law; or (c) any misdemeanor or felonydefined as a sex offense or sexually violent offense pursuant to para-graph (a), (b) or (c) of subdivision two or paragraph (a) of subdivisionthree of section one hundred sixty-eight-a of the correction law; or (d)any of the following felonies, or an attempt thereof where such attemptis a felony offense:aggravated assault upon a person less than eleven years old, asdefined in section 120.12 of the penal law; menacing in the firstdegree, as defined in section 120.13 of the penal law; reckless endan-germent in the first degree, as defined in section 120.25 of the penallaw; stalking in the second degree, as defined in section 120.55 of thepenal law; criminally negligent homicide, as defined in section 125.10of the penal law; vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, asdefined in section 125.12 of the penal law; vehicular manslaughter inthe first degree, as defined in section 125.13 of the penal law;persistent sexual abuse, as defined in section 130.53 of the penal law;aggravated sexual abuse in the fourth degree, as defined in section130.65-a of the penal law; female genital mutilation, as defined insection 130.85 of the penal law; facilitating a sex offense with acontrolled substance, as defined in section 130.90 of the penal law;unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, as defined in section 135.10of the penal law; custodial interference in the first degree, as definedin section 135.50 of the penal law; criminal trespass in the firstdegree, as defined in section 140.17 of the penal law; criminal tamper-ing in the first degree, as defined in section 145.20 of the penal law;tampering with a consumer product in the first degree, as defined insection 145.45 of the penal law; robbery in the third degree as definedin section 160.05 of the penal law; identity theft in the second degree,as defined in section 190.79 of the penal law; identity theft in thefirst degree, as defined in section 190.80 of the penal law; promotingprison contraband in the first degree, as defined in section 205.25 ofthe penal law; tampering with a witness in the third degree, as definedin section 215.11 of the penal law; tampering with a witness in thesecond degree, as defined in section 215.12 of the penal law; tamperingwith a witness in the first degree, as defined in section 215.13 of thepenal law; criminal contempt in the first degree, as defined in subdivi-sions (b), (c) and (d) of section 215.51 of the penal law; aggravatedcriminal contempt, as defined in section 215.52 of the penal law; bailjumping in the second degree, as defined in section 215.56 of the penallaw; bail jumping in the first degree, as defined in section 215.57 ofthe penal law; patronizing a prostitute in the second degree, as definedin section 230.05 of the penal law; patronizing a prostitute in thefirst degree, as defined in section 230.06 of the penal law; promotingprostitution in the second degree, as defined in section 230.30 of thepenal law; promoting prostitution in the first degree, as defined insection 230.32 of the penal law; compelling prostitution, as defined insection 230.33 of the penal law; disseminating indecent materials toS. 5560--A 3minors in the second degree, as defined in section 235.21 of the penallaw; disseminating indecent materials to minors in the first degree, asdefined in section 235.22 of the penal law; riot in the first degree, asdefined in section 240.06 of the penal law; criminal anarchy, as definedin section 240.15 of the penal law; aggravated harassment of an employeeby an inmate, as defined in section 240.32 of the penal law; unlawfulsurveillance in the second degree, as defined in section 250.45 of thepenal law; unlawful surveillance in the first degree, as defined insection 250.50 of the penal law; endangering the welfare of a vulnerableelderly person in the second degree, as defined in section 260.32 of thepenal law; endangering the welfare of a vulnerable elderly person in thefirst degree, as defined in section 260.34 of the penal law; use of achild in a sexual performance, as defined in section 263.05 of the penallaw; promoting an obscene sexual performance by a child, as defined insection 263.10 of the penal law; possessing an obscene sexual perform-ance by a child, as defined in section 263.11 of the penal law; promot-ing a sexual performance by a child, as defined in section 263.15 of thepenal law; possessing a sexual performance by a child, as defined insection 263.16 of the penal law; criminal possession of a weapon in thethird degree, as defined in section 265.02 of the penal law; criminalsale of a firearm in the third degree, as defined in section 265.11 ofthe penal law; criminal sale of a firearm to a minor, as defined insection 265.16 of the penal law; unlawful wearing of a body vest, asdefined in section 270.20 of the penal law; hate crimes as defined insection 485.05 of the penal law; and crime of terrorism, as defined insection 490.25 of the penal law; or (e) a felony defined in the penallaw or an attempt thereof where such attempt is a felony; or (f) any ofthe following misdemeanors: assault in the third degree as defined insection 120.00 of the penal law; attempted aggravated assault upon aperson less than eleven years old, as defined in section 110.00 andsection 120.12 of the penal law; attempted menacing in the first degree,as defined in section 110.00 and section 120.13 of the penal law; menac-ing in the second degree as defined in section 120.14 of the penal law;menacing in the third degree as defined in section 120.15 of the penallaw; reckless endangerment in the second degree as defined in section120.20 of the penal law; stalking in the fourth degree as defined insection 120.45 of the penal law; stalking in the third degree as definedin section 120.50 of the penal law; attempted stalking in the seconddegree, as defined in section 110.00 and section 120.55 of the penallaw; criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation as definedin section 121.11 of the penal law; forcible touching as defined insection 130.52 of the penal law regardless of the age of the victim;sexual abuse in the third degree as defined in section 130.55 of thepenal law regardless of the age of the victim; unlawful imprisonment inthe second degree as defined in section 135.05 of the penal law regard-less of the age of the victim; attempted unlawful imprisonment in thefirst degree, as defined in section 110.00 and section 135.10 of thepenal law regardless of the age of the victim; criminal trespass in thesecond degree as defined in section 140.15 of the penal law; possessionof burglar's tools as defined in section 140.35 of the penal law; petitlarceny as defined in section 155.25 of the penal law; endangering thewelfare of a child as defined in section 260.10 of the penal law; endan-gering the welfare of an incompetent or physically disabled person asdefined in section 260.25 of the penal law] ANY FELONY DEFINED IN ANY CHAPTER OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OR ANY MISDEMEANOR DEFINED IN THE PENAL LAW. S. 5560--A 4
S 2. Subdivision 3 of section 995-c of the executive law, as amended by chapter 576 of the laws of 2004, is amended to read as follows:
3. (A) Any designated offender subsequent to conviction and sentencing for a crime specified in subdivision seven of section nine hundred nine ty-five of this article, shall be required to provide a sample appropri ate for DNA testing to determine identification characteristics specific to such person and to be included in a state DNA identification index pursuant to this article. (B) (I) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO IS SENTENCED TO A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE PUBLIC SERV ANT TO WHOSE CUSTODY THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER HAS BEEN COMMITTED. (II) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHO IS SENTENCED TO A TERM OF PROBATION, INCLUDING A SENTENCE OF PROBATION IMPOSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH A SENTENCE OF IMPRISONMENT WHEN A SAMPLE HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN TAKEN, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT SUPER VISING THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER. (III) IN THE CASE OF A DESIGNATED OFFENDER WHOSE SENTENCE DOES NOT INCLUDE EITHER A TERM OF IMPRISONMENT OR A TERM OF PROBATION, THE COURT SHALL ORDER THAT THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER REPORT TO AN OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF OF THAT COUNTY, AND WHEN THE DESIGNATED OFFENDER DOES SO, SUCH SAMPLE SHALL BE COLLECTED BY THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE. (IV) NOTHING IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL PROHIBIT THE COLLECTION OF A DNA SAMPLE FROM A DESIGNATED OFFENDER BY ANY COURT OFFICIAL, STATE OR LOCAL CORRECTION OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE, PROBATION OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICER, POLICE OFFICER, PEACE OFFICER, OR OTHER PUBLIC SERVANT WHO HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES THAT SUCH DESIG NATED OFFENDER HAS NOT PROVIDED A DNA SAMPLE. UPON NOTIFICATION BY THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES THAT A DESIGNATED OFFENDER HAS NOT PROVIDED A DNA SAMPLE, SUCH COURT OFFICIAL, STATE OR LOCAL CORRECTION OFFICIAL OR EMPLOYEE, PROBATION OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICER, POLICE OFFICER, PEACE OFFICER OR OTHER PUBLIC SERVANT SHALL COLLECT THE DNA SAMPLE.
S 3. This act shall take effect October 1, 2012; provided, however, that the amendments to subdivision 7 of section 995 of the executive law made by section one of this act shall apply to conviction of designated offenses on or after such effective date.

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus