Relates to the prosecution of separate offenses based upon the same criminal act.
Sponsor: GOLDEN
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S40.20, CP L
Sponsor: GOLDEN
Law Section: Criminal Procedure Law / Law: Amd S40.20, CP L
S5776-2011 Actions
- Jun 21, 2011: SUBSTITUTED BY A8247A
- Jun 21, 2011: ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1443
- Jun 15, 2011: REFERRED TO RULES
S5776-2011 Meetings
Rules: Jun 24, 2011S5776-2011 Calendars
Floor Calendar: Jun 21, 2011S5776-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Rules
- Jun 21, 2011
Ayes (22): Skelos, Alesi, Farley, Hannon, Johnson, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Marcellino, Maziarz, Nozzolio, Saland, Seward, Sampson, Breslin, Dilan, Hassell-Thompson, Krueger, Parker, Perkins, Smith, Stewart-Cousins
Ayes W/R (1): Duane
S5776-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S5776 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the prosecution of separate offenses based upon the same criminal act PURPOSE: This bill closes a loophole in the statutory "double jeopardy" provisions of CPL 40.20 that currently operate to bar a prosecution for state and New York City income tax related crimes where the defendant was previously prosecuted in federal court for federal income tax offenses based on the "same act or criminal transaction." SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section one adds a new paragraph (i) to subdivision two of section 40.20 of the Criminal Procedure Law to create an additional exception to the existing bar on separate prosecutions "based on the same act or criminal transaction" in certain cases where the subsequent state prosecution is for a state or New York City income tax-related crime and the previous prosecution was for a federal income tax-related offense. Section two establishes an effective date of 90 days. EXISTING LAW: Subject to certain enumerated exceptions, CPL 40.20(2) currently prohibits separate prosecutions for two offenses "based on the same act or criminal transaction." JUSTIFICATION: During the investigation into alleged tax crimes on the part of Leona Helmsley, federal and state prosecutors realized that they were both looking into similar fact patterns; They created a joint investigation, while maintaining separate cases against federal and state violations, respectful of their jurisdiction. After the federal criminal case went to court, the State presented its case. Despite the fact that the cases were distinct and the criminal statutes involved were federal in one case and state in the other, the Appellate Division affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the state charges on the ground that they were based on the "same criminal transaction" as the federal tax charges, that separate prosecutions were therefore barred under CPL 40.20(2) and that none of the existing exceptions to the bar on separate prosecutions applied. See, People v. Helmsley, 170 A.D.2d 209 (1991). It makes no sense to give an individual a free pass for tax crimes committed against the people of the State of New York owing to a concurrent investigation and prosecution at the federal level for violations of federal tax laws. This legislation seeks to close this loophole created by state statutory and case law. PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: None. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: This legislation is expected to result in increased revenue to the State and New York City by enhancing prosecutors' ability to pursue and criminally prosecute tax fraud and related state and New York City income tax-related offenses. EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect 90 days after it shall have become a law.
S5776-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
5776 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE June 15, 2011
Introduced by Sen. GOLDEN -- (at request of the Attorney General) - read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to the prose cution of separate offenses based upon the same criminal act THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 2 of section 40.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new paragraph (i) to read as follows:
(I) ONE OF THE OFFENSES CONSISTS OF A VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 371, WHERE THE OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY IS TO ATTEMPT IN ANY MANNER TO EVADE OR DEFEAT ANY FEDERAL INCOME TAX OR THE PAYMENT THEREOF, OR A VIOLATION OF 26 U.S.C. 7201, 26 U.S.C. 7202, 26 U.S.C. 7203, 26 U.S.C. 7204, 26 U.S.C. 7205, 26 U.S.C. 7206 OR 26 U.S.C. 7212(A), WHERE THE PURPOSE IS TO EVADE OR DEFEAT ANY FEDERAL INCOME TAX OR THE PAYMENT THEREOF, AND THE OTHER OFFENSE IS COMMITTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVADING OR DEFEATING ANY NEW YORK STATE OR NEW YORK CITY INCOME TAXES AND IS DEFINED IN ARTI CLE ONE HUNDRED FIFTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW, ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY OF THE PENAL LAW, ARTICLE ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE OF THE PENAL LAW, ARTICLE THIRTY-SEVEN OF THE TAX LAW OR CHAPTER FORTY OF TITLE ELEVEN OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law and shall only apply to offenses committed on and after such date. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD11792-07-1

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus