Bill S6445-2013

Relates to insurer recovery from health care providers

Relates to insurer recovery from health care providers; provides that except where there is a reasonable belief of fraud or intentional misconduct, a health plan shall not determine an overpayment amount through the use of extrapolation except with the consent of the health care provider.

Details

Actions

  • Jan 24, 2014: REFERRED TO INSURANCE

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S6445

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to insurer recovery from health care providers

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL:

To enable fair and equitable resolution of allegations by insurers that a health care professional has been overpaid for a benefit claim.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS:

The bill would amend section 3224-b of the insurance law to prohibit the use of extrapolation to determine amounts overpaid except in instances where there is a reasonable belief of fraud or intentional misconduct, to prohibit threats of retribution against health care professionals who challenge allegations of overpayment, and to require health plans to initiate overpayment proceedings within 12 months (instead of the current 24) of the payment.

JUSTIFICATION:

In some instances, health plans use the practice of extrapolation of a relatively few claims to determine overpayment amounts that can stretch into tens of thousands, and perhaps even hundreds of thousands, of dollars. Contesting a refund demand is difficult, and results in extraordinary legal and other expert costs. As a result, health care providers are often intimidated into settling the dispute.

It can be burdensome and harassing to require a physician to defend bills submitted and paid two years back. Health plans should act expeditiously if they have reasonable demands for recouping overpayments.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:

2010: A.10850 - referred to Insurance Committee 2011-2012: A.1538 - referred to Insurance Committee

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:

None.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 6445 IN SENATE January 24, 2014 ___________
Introduced by Sen. RIVERA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to insurer recovery from health care providers THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Paragraph 3 of subsection (b) of section 3224-b of the insurance law, as amended by chapter 237 of the laws of 2009, is amended and two new paragraphs 6 and 7 are added to read as follows: (3) A health plan shall not initiate overpayment recovery efforts more than [twenty-four] TWELVE months after the original payment was received by a health care provider. However, no such time limit shall apply to overpayment recovery efforts that are: (i) based on a reasonable belief of fraud or other intentional misconduct[, or abusive billing], (ii) required by, or initiated at the request of, a self-insured plan, or (iii) required or authorized by a state or federal government program or coverage that is provided by this state or a municipality thereof to its respective employees, retirees or members. Notwithstanding the aforemen- tioned time limitations, in the event that a health care provider asserts that a health plan has underpaid a claim or claims, the health plan may defend or set off such assertion of underpayment based on over- payments going back in time as far as the claimed underpayment. [For purposes of this paragraph, "abusive billing" shall be defined as a billing practice which results in the submission of claims that are not consistent with sound fiscal, business, or medical practices and at such frequency and for such a period of time as to reflect a consistent course of conduct.] (6) A HEALTH PLAN SHALL NOT DETERMINE AN OVERPAYMENT AMOUNT THROUGH THE USE OF EXTRAPOLATION EXCEPT WITH THE CONSENT OF THE HEALTH CARE PROVIDER, EXCEPT WHERE THERE IS A REASONABLE BELIEF OF FRAUD OR INTEN- TIONAL MISCONDUCT. (7) A HEALTH CARE PLAN MAY NOT THREATEN TO SANCTION A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER INCLUDING A REPORT TO A RELEVANT DISCIPLINARY BODY AS A RESULT OF A HEALTH CARE PROVIDER CHALLENGING AN ALLEGED OVERPAYMENT EXCEPT
WHERE THERE IS A REASONABLE BELIEF OF FRAUD OR INTENTIONAL MISCONDUCT. A HEALTH CARE PLAN FOUND TO HAVE VIOLATED THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A FINE OF FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER VIOLATION. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus