Decreases the allowable base percentage change in agriculture assessment value from ten percent to two percent of the preceding year.
Sponsor: RITCHIE
Committee: AGRICULTURE
Law Section: Agriculture and Markets Law
Law: Amd S304-a, Ag & Mkts L
Law Section: Agriculture and Markets Law
Law: Amd S304-a, Ag & Mkts L
S6609-2011 Actions
- Jun 18, 2012: referred to agriculture
- Jun 18, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
- Jun 18, 2012: PASSED SENATE
- Mar 29, 2012: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Mar 28, 2012: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Mar 27, 2012: 1ST REPORT CAL.456
- Mar 2, 2012: REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE
S6609-2011 Meetings
Agriculture: Mar 27, 2012S6609-2011 Calendars
Active List: Jun 18, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 28, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 29, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 17, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 18, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 19, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 25, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 26, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 1, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 2, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 7, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 8, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 9, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 14, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 15, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 16, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 21, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 22, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 23, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 31, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 4, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 5, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 6, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 11, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 12, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 13, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 14, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 18, 2012S6609-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Agriculture
- Mar 27, 2012
Ayes (10): Ritchie, Gallivan, O'Mara, Ranzenhofer, Seward, Young, Kennedy, Avella, Huntley, Valesky
VOTE: FLOOR VOTE:
- Jun 18, 2012
Ayes (56): Addabbo, Avella, Ball, Bonacic, Breslin, Carlucci, DeFrancisco, Diaz, Dilan, Duane, Farley, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Gallivan, Gianaris, Golden, Griffo, Grisanti, Hannon, Hassell-Thomps, Johnson, Kennedy, Klein, Krueger, Lanza, Larkin, LaValle, Libous, Little, Marcellino, Martins, Maziarz, McDonald, Montgomery, Nozzolio, Oppenheimer, Parker, Peralta, Ranzenhofer, Ritchie, Rivera, Robach, Saland, Sampson, Savino, Serrano, Seward, Skelos, Smith, Squadron, Stavisky, Stewart-Cousin, Storobin, Valesky, Young, Zeldin
Excused (6): Adams, Alesi, Espaillat, Huntley, O'Mara, Perkins
S6609-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S6609 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to agricultural assessment values PURPOSE: This bill amends the agriculture and markets law in relation to agricultural assessments by reducing the cap on the amount of change that may occur in the value of the base agricultural assessment value from ten percent to two percent of the value of the preceding year. SUMMARY: Section one amends the agriculture and markets law, section 304-a (g) by reducing the cap in the amount of change in the base agricultural assessment value for any given year from ten percent to two percent of the base agricultural assessment value of the preceding year. Section two provides the effective date. JUSTIFICATION: Farmers have been seeing alarming increases in their property taxes for farmland because of increases in their farmland assessments or "agricultural assessments". New York established its agricultural assessment program to keep rising property assessments, particularly in high pressure development areas, from forcing farmers out of business and eroding acres of open, working green space from the State's landscape. Agricultural assessments have been increasing because the 'base rate" per farm acre utilized in the assessment formula - or the starting point for assessing farm land - has been rising. Even under a 2% property tax cap, farmland property taxes can still see significant increases even when the local municipal tax rate stays low. While the tax rate may not increase, the higher assessed values will be the factor that drives farmland property taxes higher until they reach unsustainable levels. Currently, there is a 10% cap in place which is mitigating extreme and forceful increases in base rate values, but this is only a minor moderation. Agricultural assessments have and are projected to continue to increase above the 10% cap for the foreseeable future and will force many farm families to reconsider their ability to operate in New York State. As a land-intensive business, New York has one of the highest property tax burdens in the nation which puts the State at a distinct disadvantage with other states. The average property tax per farm acre of $26.21 is far higher than the national average of $6.75 per farm acre and even higher than California which is $25.18 per farm acre. A 2% tax cap on annual agricultural assessment increases will keep New York's family farms on their land and maintain the nutritious, high quality local food network that the State's consumers expect. HISTORY: New bill. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None to State. EFFECTIVE DATE: Immediately.
S6609-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6609
I N SENATE
March 2, 2012
___________
Introduced by Sens. RITCHIE, GRIFFO, YOUNG -- read twice and ordered
printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Agricul-
ture
AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to agricul-
tural assessment values
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Paragraph g of subdivision 4 of section 304-a of the agri-
culture and markets law, as added by chapter 68 of the laws of 2007, is
amended to read as follows:
g. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section to the contra-
ry, in no event shall the change in the base agricultural assessment
value for any given year exceed [ten] TWO percent of the base agricul-
tural assessment value of the preceding year.
S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14442-01-2

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus