Relates to the notice of intention to arbitrate.
S6650-2011 Actions
- Jun 21, 2012: COMMITTED TO RULES
- Mar 22, 2012: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
- Mar 21, 2012: 2ND REPORT CAL.
- Mar 20, 2012: 1ST REPORT CAL.396
- Mar 8, 2012: REFERRED TO JUDICIARY
S6650-2011 Meetings
Judiciary: Mar 20, 2012S6650-2011 Calendars
Floor Calendar: Mar 21, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 22, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 26, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 27, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 28, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 29, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Mar 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 17, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 18, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 19, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 25, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 26, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Apr 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 1, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 2, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 7, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 8, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 9, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 14, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 15, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 16, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 21, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 22, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 23, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 30, 2012 , Floor Calendar: May 31, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 4, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 5, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 6, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 11, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 12, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 13, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 14, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 18, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 19, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 20, 2012 , Floor Calendar: Jun 21, 2012S6650-2011 Votes
VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE:
- Judiciary
- Mar 20, 2012
Ayes (21): Bonacic, Flanagan, Fuschillo, Lanza, LaValle, Little, Nozzolio, O'Mara, Ranzenhofer, Saland, Zeldin, Hassell-Thompson, Breslin, Dilan, Espaillat, Gianaris, Krueger, Perkins, Serrano, Squadron, Stavisky
Nays (1): DeFrancisco
S6650-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S6650 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the notice of intention to arbitrate This is one in a series of measures being introduced at the request of the Chief Administrative Judge upon the recommendation of her Advisory Committee on Civil Practice. This measure would amend subdivision (c) of CPLR 7503, which presently provides for the service of a demand for arbitration or notice of intention to arbitrate, and the time in which to object to arbitrability. The notice requirement specifies that unless a party served with a demand applies to stay the arbitration within twenty days after service, such party shall thereafter be precluded from challenging the agreement to arbitrate or from asserting in court the bar of the statute of limitations. This measure would extend this twenty-day time period to thirty days. The service of a demand for arbitration may be done in the manner of a summons, but also by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. The requirement under 7503(c) that the application must be made "within twenty days after service" has been interpreted to mean receipt by the respondent in the arbitration. (Knickerbocker Insurance Co. v. Gilbert, 28 NY2d 57, 66 [1971]; Prudential Securities Inc. v. Warsh, 214 AD2d [2d Dept 1995]). Nevertheless, particularly in cases where there may be a genuine dispute regarding the existence or scope of the agreement to arbitrate, or where documentary evidence of same must be obtained, the twenty day time period can be unreasonably short, and raise difficulties for a party with a legitimate objection to arbitration. The public policy in favor of arbitration is strong, and the twenty day period advances the objective of a swift and sure resolution of the arbitrability question. However, we believe that, on balance, extending the period of time from twenty to thirty days will ameliorate some legitimate difficulties of a party with a valid objection to arbitration, and at the same time not unreasonably affect the policy in favor of swift resolution of arbitration disputes. This measure would have no fiscal impact on the State. It would take effect on the first of January next succeeding the date on which it shall become law and shall apply to all actions pending on such effective date or commenced on or after such effective date. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: None. New proposal.
S6650-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
6650
I N SENATE
March 8, 2012
___________
Introduced by Sen. BONACIC -- (at request of the Office of Court Admin-
istration) -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be
committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to the
notice of intention to arbitrate
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision (c) of section 7503 of the civil practice law
and rules, as amended by chapter 1028 of the laws of 1973, is amended to
read as follows:
(c) Notice of intention to arbitrate. A party may serve upon another
party a demand for arbitration or a notice of intention to arbitrate,
specifying the agreement pursuant to which arbitration is sought and the
name and address of the party serving the notice, or of an officer or
agent thereof if such party is an association or corporation, and stat-
ing that unless the party served applies to stay the arbitration within
[twenty] THIRTY days after such service [he] THE PARTY shall thereafter
be precluded from objecting that a valid agreement was not made or has
not been complied with and from asserting in court the bar of a limita-
tion of time. Such notice or demand shall be served in the same manner
as a summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt
requested. An application to stay arbitration must be made by the party
served within [twenty] THIRTY days after service upon [him] SUCH PARTY
of the notice or demand, or [he] THE PARTY shall be so precluded.
Notice of such application shall be served in the same manner as a
summons or by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested.
Service of the application may be made upon the adverse party, or upon
[his] SUCH PARTY'S attorney if the attorney's name appears on the demand
for arbitration or the notice of intention to arbitrate. Service of the
application by mail shall be timely if such application is posted within
the prescribed period. Any provision in an arbitration agreement or
arbitration rules which waives the right to apply for a stay of arbi-
tration is hereby declared null and void.
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD14024-01-2
S. 6650 2
S 2. This act shall take effect on the first of January next succeed-
ing the date on which it shall have become a law and shall apply to all
actions pending on such effective date or commenced on or after such
effective date.

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that links to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.
*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus