Bill S7144-2011

Relates to alternative institutional support programs for school districts

Relates to experimental alternative institutional support programs for school districts.

Details

Actions

  • Jun 20, 2012: referred to education
  • Jun 20, 2012: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
  • Jun 20, 2012: PASSED SENATE
  • Jun 11, 2012: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
  • Jun 6, 2012: 2ND REPORT CAL.
  • Jun 5, 2012: 1ST REPORT CAL.1034
  • May 1, 2012: REFERRED TO EDUCATION

Meetings

Calendars

Votes

VOTE: COMMITTEE VOTE: - Education - Jun 5, 2012
Ayes (17): Flanagan, Lanza, LaValle, Marcellino, Maziarz, Ranzenhofer, Robach, Saland, Seward, Oppenheimer, Addabbo, Avella, Breslin, Montgomery, Serrano, Stavisky, Huntley
Excused (1): Farley

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S7144

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the education law, in relation to alternative institutional support programs

PURPOSE: To allow school districts to contract with approved alternative institutional support services programs to students at risk who may benefit from such programs.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Section 1 of the bill amends Section 3641 of the education law by adding a new subdivision 16. Paragraph one provides that public school districts shall be authorized to contract with alternative institutional support services programs to provide instruction and support services to special and non-special education students who are at-risk.

Paragraph two provides that the contracting school district shall provide the alternative institutional support services program with the actual cost of services provided and that the students shall continue to be counted by the District of Residence for purposes of determining Federal and State Aid.

Paragraph three provides that school districts may also contract with approved alternative institutional support services programs to serve as Interim Alternative Educational Settings (IAES), as defined by Federal and State law compensation to the approved alternative institutional support services programs for serving as an IAES shall be on an actual cost basis.

Paragraph four provides that the Commissioner of Education shall process applications for and maintain a list of approved alternative institutional support services programs and requires that a not-for-profit, non-sectarian educational program be approved as an approved alternative institutional support services program if the program utilizes certified personnel and has demonstrated a minimum often (10) years of improved student performance for at-risk students.

Section 2 of the bill provides for an effective date.

JUSTIFICATION: The number of students who are at-risk of failing and/or dropping out of school has reached epidemic proportions. Addressing the needs of at-risk students is vital to maintaining and improving the health of the State's educational system. Students both with and without disabilities who are (i) at-risk of dropping out of school, (ii) in danger of academic failure, (iii) excessively truant, (iv) school phobic, (v) peer relationship challenged, (vi) have engaged in

certain disciplinary situations or (vi) at risk of placement in a residential setting can often succeed if provided with the right alternative learning experience, such as highly individualized or very small group instruction with supports. Yet, public schools are often not equipped with the flexibility or resources to offer this type of programming to its students.

Several not-for-profit programs throughout the State have extensive experience in providing alternative learning experiences to these types of students. Indeed, in many cases, students otherwise at risk of dropping out or failing have successfully earned High School diplomas with the assistance of these programs. The Education and Assistance Corporation Learning Centers (EAC), for example, served at risk students for over 40 years while consistently demonstrating success for at-risk youngsters who would otherwise be on the cusp of dropping out of school or being placed in a residential setting. Despite the fact that EAC provided services to students who are often considered at the greatest risk of failing or ceasing their education, almost 95% of its students earn a high school diploma.

These program models are community based not-for-profit programs poised to provide innovative education solutions to some of the state's most needy youth. The programs have the capacity to accept students expeditiously and swiftly provide them with intense support. Moreover, where appropriate, programs like EAC have been successful in transitioning youth back into their home public schools for graduation.

Despite EAC's long success and the school district's support, the programs ceased operation in June 2011, because there is no legislative authority to enable public school districts to contract with private not-for-profits to provide educational services to at-risk students. Without the instant legislation this fragile population is at even greater risk of not receiving the types of services they need to meet with success, and the achievement gap will continue to widen. This legislation bridges that gap by enabling public schools to contract with not-for-profit corporations and supports some of the State's neediest students in reaching the top of their educational potential.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: New bill.

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: No new costs.

EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 7144 IN SENATE May 1, 2012 ___________
Introduced by Sen. HANNON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to alternative institu- tional support programs THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 3641 of the education law is amended by adding a new subdivision 16 to read as follows: 16. ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AID. A. BOARDS OF EDUCATION OF CITY, COMMON, UNION FREE AND CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICTS SHALL BE AUTHOR- IZED TO CONTRACT WITH APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONAL AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO SPECIAL EDUCATION AND/OR NON-SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENTS WHO ARE DEEMED BY THE DISTRICT TO BE AT-RISK. B. PAYMENT PURSUANT TO SUCH CONTRACT SHALL BE FROM THE DISTRICT TO THE APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM FOR THE ACTUAL COST OF THE APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM'S PROVISION OF SERVICES AND INCLUDE COSTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, INSTRUCTIONAL, OPERATING AND SUPPORT SERVICES EXPENSES PROPORTIONATE TO THE STUDENT'S ATTENDANCE IN THE PROGRAM. STUDENTS WHO ATTEND THE APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM SHALL CONTINUE TO BE COUNTED BY THE DISTRICT OF RESIDENCE FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING FEDERAL AND STATE AID TO THE DISTRICT RELATIVE TO STUDENTS WITH AND WITHOUT DISABILITIES. C. DISTRICTS MAY ALSO CONTRACT WITH AN APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITU- TIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM TO SERVE AS AN INTERIM ALTERNATIVE EDUCATIONAL SETTING, AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABIL- ITIES EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT AND CONCURRENT STATE LAW. A DISTRICT MAY CONTRACT WITH THE APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM FOR SERVICES AS AN INTERIM ALTERNATIVE EDUCATIONAL SETTING WHEN- EVER A STUDENT IS ELIGIBLE FOR SUCH PLACEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW, SUCH AS IN CERTAIN DISCIPLINARY CONTEXTS.
D. THE DISTRICT SHALL COMPENSATE AN APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM SERVING AS AN INTERIM ALTERNATIVE EDUCATION SETTING ON AN ACTUAL COST BASIS. E. THE COMMISSIONER SHALL PROCESS APPLICATIONS FOR AND MAINTAIN A LIST OF APPROVED ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAMS. AN ALTERNATIVE INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT SERVICES PROGRAM SHALL BE APPROVED IF IT IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT, NON-SECTARIAN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM THAT UTILIZES CERTIFIED PERSONNEL AND HAS DEMONSTRATED A MINIMUM OF TEN YEARS OF IMPROVED STUDENT PERFORMANCE FOR AT-RISK STUDENTS. S 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus