Relates to finger imaging of certain persons receiving food stamps.
Sponsor: SQUADRON / Co-sponsor(s): DUANE, KRUEGER, OPPENHEIMER, PARKER / Committee: RULES
Law Section: Social Services Law / Law: Amd S139-a, Soc Serv L
Sponsor: SQUADRON / Co-sponsor(s): DUANE, KRUEGER, OPPENHEIMER, PARKER / Committee: RULES
Law Section: Social Services Law / Law: Amd S139-a, Soc Serv L
S740-2011 Actions
- Mar 12, 2012: COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
- Feb 27, 2012: NOTICE OF COMMITTEE CONSIDERATION - REQUESTED
- Jan 4, 2012: REFERRED TO SOCIAL SERVICES
- Jan 5, 2011: REFERRED TO SOCIAL SERVICES
S740-2011 Meetings
Social Services: Mar 13, 2012S740-2011 Memo
BILL NUMBER:S740 TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the social services law, in relation to finger imaging for food stamps recipients PURPOSE: The purpose of this bill is to eliminate the finger imaging matching identification system for applicants or recipients of food stamps who are not also applicants for, or recipients of, family or safety net assistance. SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS: Amends subdivision 3 of section 139-a of the law, to repeal the finger imaging matching identification system for applicants or recipients of food stamps who are not also applicants for, or recipients of, family or safety net assistance. JUSTIFICATION: New York is one of the four remaining states in the country where finger imaging for food stamps still occurs. Finger imaging is required at the time of application for public assistance. In order for needy families to get food stamps all adult members or heads of households must have their finger images taken. If they don't comply their entire household is threatened and cannot receive public assistance. Applicants for emergency assistance must also be finger imaged in New York. In a study conducted by a non-partisan, non-profit policy research organization it was found that finger imaging was not cost effective, and does not substantially deter fraud. The study concluded that in Texas and California finger imaging produces serious drawbacks that included low numbers of fraud detection, high numbers of administrative errors, and an elongated and inefficient process that deters indigent people from applying. Finger imaging serves as a deterrent for eligible individuals to access food stamps, which are paid for by the federal government. It carries a stigma with it that is degrading to an applicant who might feel that their dignity is worth more than government assistance although they might be in dire need. Recently, the Governor of New York waived the finger imaging requirement for certain working families, recognizing that food is a basic necessity of life and that it is bad policy to require finger imaging as a prerequisite to assistance with food costs. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: 2007: A.10215 2010: S.6291-A/A.1681-A FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: No new fiscal implications. EFFECTIVE DATE: 180 days following enactment.
S740-2011 Text
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
740 2011-2012 Regular Sessions I N SENATE (PREFILED)
January 5, 2011
Introduced by Sens. SQUADRON, DUANE, KRUEGER, PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Social Services AN ACT to amend the social services law, in relation to finger imaging for food stamps recipients THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 139-a of the social services law is amended by adding a new paragraph (n) to read as follows:
(N) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW TO THE CONTRARY, APPLI CANTS OR RECIPIENTS OF FOOD STAMPS WHO ARE NOT ALSO APPLICANTS FOR, OR RECIPIENTS OF, FAMILY OR SAFETY NET ASSISTANCE SHALL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE FINGER IMAGING MATCHING IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM.
S 2. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law. EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets [ ] is old law to be omitted. LBD03868-01-1

*By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and Privacy Policy and verify you are over 13.
Discuss!
blog comments powered by Disqus