Bill S870C-2013

Authorizes certain cities to adjudicate traffic infractions

Authorizes the city of Buffalo to provide by local law for the adjudication of traffic infractions.

Details

Actions

  • Jun 19, 2014: returned to senate
  • Jun 19, 2014: passed assembly
  • Jun 19, 2014: home rule request
  • Jun 19, 2014: ordered to third reading rules cal.537
  • Jun 19, 2014: substituted for a3702c
  • Jun 18, 2014: referred to ways and means
  • Jun 18, 2014: DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY
  • Jun 18, 2014: PASSED SENATE
  • Jun 18, 2014: HOME RULE REQUEST
  • Jun 9, 2014: ADVANCED TO THIRD READING
  • Jun 3, 2014: 2ND REPORT CAL.
  • Jun 3, 2014: AMENDED 870C
  • Jun 2, 2014: 1ST REPORT CAL.1059
  • Apr 29, 2014: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
  • Jan 8, 2014: REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION
  • Oct 9, 2013: PRINT NUMBER 870B
  • Oct 9, 2013: AMEND AND RECOMMIT TO RULES
  • Jun 11, 2013: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO RULES
  • Apr 17, 2013: PRINT NUMBER 870A
  • Apr 17, 2013: AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO FINANCE
  • Feb 28, 2013: REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE
  • Jan 9, 2013: REFERRED TO TRANSPORTATION

Calendars

Votes

Memo

BILL NUMBER:S870C

TITLE OF BILL: An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to directing the city of Buffalo to adjudicate traffic infractions

PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL: This legislation would allow the city of Buffalo the same authority offered to its surrounding suburbs to adjudicate traffic violations. Currently, the state of New York adjudicates all traffic violations in the city of Buffalo.

SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS: Section 1. The vehicle and traffic law is amended by adding Subdivision 1 of Section 225 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law.

JUSTIFICATION: The purpose of this legislation is to allow the city of Buffalo to adjudicate traffic infractions. New York State currently holds all hearings in Buffalo without the option of a plea bargain system. If the City of Buffalo adjudicates traffic infractions they will implement a system that would allow traffic violators to have an option of a plea bargain, which could lead to traffic school. This system would offer two benefits to Buffalo residents now currently enjoyed by suburban residents; the violator would be allowed to attend traffic school thus hopefully becoming a safer and better driver and also after attending school would not receive any points on his/her license which in turn raises his/her insurance rates. City of Buffalo residents already pay higher insurance rates and this system only causes these rates to increase without any of the options that are offered in the surrounding areas.

PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: S.1156B Passed Senate in 2010-11

FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

Immediately.


Text

STATE OF NEW YORK ________________________________________________________________________ 870--C Cal. No. 1059 2013-2014 Regular Sessions IN SENATE (PREFILED) January 9, 2013 ___________
Introduced by Sens. GRISANTI, KENNEDY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Rules -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- recommitted to the Committee on Transportation in accordance with Senate Rule 6, sec. 8 -- reported favorably from said committee and committed to the Committee on Finance -- reported favor- ably from said committee, ordered to first report, amended on first report, ordered to a second report and ordered reprinted, retaining its place in the order of second report AN ACT to amend the vehicle and traffic law, in relation to directing the city of Buffalo to adjudicate traffic infractions THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 155 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by chapter 628 of the laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows: S 155. Traffic infraction. The violation of any provision of this chapter, except articles forty-seven and forty-eight, or of any law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation regulating traffic which is not declared by this chapter or other law of this state to be a misdemeanor or a felony. A traffic infraction is not a crime and the punishment imposed therefor shall not be deemed for any purpose a penal or criminal punishment and shall not affect or impair the credibility as a witness or otherwise of any person convicted thereof. This definition shall be retroactive and shall apply to all acts and violations heretofore committed where such acts and violations would, if committed subsequent to the taking effect of this section, be included within the meaning of
the term "traffic infraction" as herein defined. Except in those portions of Suffolk county for which a district court has been estab- lished, outside of cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand BUT LESS THAN TWO HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND in which administra- tive tribunals have heretofore been established AND OUTSIDE OF CITIES HAVING A POPULATION IN EXCESS OF ONE MILLION IN WHICH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN ESTABLISHED, courts and judicial officers heretofore having jurisdiction over such violations shall continue to do so and for such purpose such violations shall be deemed misdemeanors and all provisions of law relating to misdemeanors except as provided in section eighteen hundred five of this chapter and except as herein otherwise expressly provided shall apply except that no jury trial shall be allowed for traffic infractions. In those portions of Suffolk county for which a district court has been established, and in cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand BUT LESS THAN TWO HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established AND IN CITIES HAVING A POPULATION IN EXCESS OF ONE MILLION IN WHICH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS HAVE HERETOFORE BEEN ESTABLISHED, the criminal courts of such cities or portions of Suffolk county in which a district court has been established shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any complaint alleging a violation constituting a traffic infraction, except that administrative tribunals heretofore established in such cities or portions of Suffolk county in which a district court has been established shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any charge of an offense which is a traffic infraction, except parking, standing or stopping. In cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, and any such administrative tribunal established by the city of Yonkers, the city of Peekskill, or the city of Syracuse, such tribunals shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any charge of an offense which is a parking, standing or stopping violation. Any fine imposed by an administrative tribunal shall be a civil penalty. For purposes of arrest without a warrant, pursuant to article one hundred forty of the criminal procedure law, a traffic infraction shall be deemed an offense. S 2. Subdivision 1 of section 225 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by chapter 388 of the laws of 2012, is amended to read as follows: 1. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law, all violations of this chapter or of a law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation relat- ing to traffic, except parking, standing, stopping or pedestrian offenses, which occur within a city having a population of two hundred thousand or more BUT LESS THAN TWO HUNDRED TWENTY THOUSAND in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, OR WITHIN A CITY HAVING A POPULATION OF ONE MILLION OR MORE IN WHICH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS HAVE HERETOFORE, BEEN ESTABLISHED, and which are classified as traffic infractions, may be heard and determined pursuant to the regu- lations of the commissioner as provided in this article. Whenever a crime and a traffic infraction arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, a charge alleging both offenses may be made returnable before the court having jurisdiction over the crime. Nothing herein provided shall be construed to prevent a court, having jurisdiction over a criminal charge relating to traffic or a traffic infraction, from lawfully entering a judgment of conviction, whether or not based on a plea of guilty, for any offense classified as a traffic infraction.
S 3. Pending actions and proceedings. (a) No proceeding involving a charge of a traffic infraction pending at such time when an existing administrative tribunal shall cease to exist shall be affected or abated by the passage of this act or by anything herein contained or by the cessation of the existence of any administrative tribunal. All such proceedings are hereby transferred to the court of appropriate jurisdic- tion in the city where such traffic infractions allegedly occurred. (b)(i) The agency, department, office, or person charged with the custody of the records of an existing administrative tribunal which is about to cease existing under, or in connection with, this act shall arrange for the transfer of the records of pending proceedings to the court of appropriate jurisdiction to which the proceedings shall be transferred. The presiding judge of such court shall enter an order providing for adequate notice consistent with due process of law to respondents in such pending proceedings regarding the transfer of such proceedings. (ii) In no event shall any difficulty or delay resulting from the transfer process, not caused by the respondent, increase the penalty required of the respondent appearing before the court due to a transfer of the traffic infraction proceeding or otherwise prejudice such respondent. Respondents before the court due to a transfer of the traf- fic infraction proceeding from an administrative tribunal to the court that fail to appear shall be permitted at least one adjournment before the penalties and procedures pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 226 of the vehicle and traffic law shall be available. The presiding judge of such court shall enter an order providing for adequate notice consistent with due process of law to respondents, including notice of the penal- ties and procedures available pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 226 of the vehicle and traffic law. S 4. This act shall take effect immediately.

Comments

Open Legislation comments facilitate discussion of New York State legislation. All comments are subject to moderation. Comments deemed off-topic, commercial, campaign-related, self-promotional; or that contain profanity or hate speech; or that link to sites outside of the nysenate.gov domain are not permitted, and will not be published. Comment moderation is generally performed Monday through Friday.

By contributing or voting you agree to the Terms of Participation and verify you are over 13.

Discuss!

blog comments powered by Disqus